Article View: aus.org.efa
Article #785Re: NSW Internet Legislation
From: Richard Mazzaferri
Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 00:00
49 lines
3522 bytes
3522 bytes
dallet@ozemail.com.au (Michael Wines) wrote: > ryan@zip.com.au (Patrick Ryan) wrote: > > >5. Will the legislation make it easier to catch peadophiles ? > > >It will merely force the perpertrators to use readily available > >encryption techniques which will require police forces to use multiple > >supercomputers (which they don't have) in order to read a simple > >message. This combined with the daily exponential increase in network > >traffic will only make it difficult for police agencies. > > They might make encryption illegal. Or they might mandate > encryption techniques which allow spies and secret police to > decrypt any message. The digital mobile phone encryption in > Australia is organised this way. The Federal Police and the > spy agencies have the encryption keys to allow them to > listen to conversations on digital mobile phones. In which case perpetrators will start using steganography - embedding encrypted information in a data file that appears quite normal. There have been programs available on the net for years that do this. It's probably impossible in almost every case to prove that someone is using that technique to get around encryption laws. > >6. Perpertrators can fake their mail addresses making it next to > >impossible to prove that a person sent the offending transmission. > > Oddly enough this is the reason the Senate Committee into > Internet Censorship suggested mandating strong encryption - > to make it mandatory to create encrypted digital signatures > on all messages, so that people couldn't hide their > identities. Won't "they" just start using fake digital signatures? What's to stop someone creating a new public/private key pair and using that to provide a "signature", or faking the signature data itself? Is *every* e-mail message going to have its signature verified against some sort of massive database containing everyone's registered public keys (rather like the Australia Card for those who use e-mail)? This will either become a further burden on ISPs, or will again raise the spectre of Big Brother if it's done at some central (government?) server - which will crash every so often, disabling e-mail for everyone in the state... Have fun, Mazz. mazz@faceng.newcastle.edu.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<318c2465.47734976@news.newcastle.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4mbtpn$41s@the-fly.zip.com.au> <4mcmg2$5n3@the-fly.zip.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa7f6,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gidfa7f6,public X-Google-Thread: 107bb0,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid107bb0,public X-Google-Thread: 108449,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid108449,public X-Google-Thread: 14269f,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid14269f,public X-Google-Thread: 102c27,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid102c27,public X-Google-Thread: 104b62,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid104b62,public X-Google-Thread: f4bcb,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bcb,public X-Google-Thread: 1151c9,80a172ed52997cfc X-Google-Attributes: gid1151c9,public From: mazz@faceng.newcastle.edu.au (Richard Mazzaferri) Subject: Re: NSW Internet Legislation Date: 1996/05/05 Message-ID: <318c2465.47734976@news.newcastle.edu.au> X-Deja-AN: 153069065 distribution: inet references: <4mbtpn$41s@the-fly.zip.com.au> <4mcmg2$5n3@the-fly.zip.com.au> organization: Newcastle University newsgroups: aus.org.efa,syd.seminar,aus.culture.ultimo,aus.news,aus.legal,aus.net.policy,zip.announce,aus.org.waia,aus.net.announce,aus.org.acs,aus.politics,aus.legal,comp.org.eff.talk,aus.org.auug