🚀 go-pugleaf

"GB" <g.b@sonicresearch.mailme.org> wrote in message 
news:CfW3f.956$uQ6.46647@news.optus.net.au...
> atec <atec77@###hotmail.com> wrote in news:434f6446$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:
>> You didnt think this through did you k , better to sell the dog due to
>> what ever circumstances than keep it and possibly not offer its full
>> duty of care .
>
> He thought it through plenty good. If the retard is selling a dog
> like that, then he deserves not to have ever been allowed to keep a
> god in the first place, nor ever again.

You have not thought this through very well either, You are willing to judge 
without knowing the full facts.

This dog is loved otherwise he would not have been walked twice a day,
If he is a candidate for dumping why would he only sell to "for sale to a 
good caring home" why not just dump it now.

Do you presume to know how he feels about selling? maybe the circumstances 
have change (changes can occur over which we have no control) that make it 
impossible to keek a much loved pet. (Can you predict a change of 
circumstance 2 years from now over which you have no control).



>>  Now abusing the bloke is very rude and I suggest if you are genuine
>> then buy the creature and be happy , or hush up.

Why don't you buy the dog.
>
> Abusing the bloke is the least he could do. Dropping by his house
> and exacting a more appropriate punishment is what is called for.

Now you show the real you a VIOLENT idiot who thinks any problem can be 
solved by the fist.
>
>
> Go spend a day sitting in the waiting room at an RSPCA shelter
> somewhere. You'll see a constant stream of truely lovely (and
> completely bewildered) animals being dumped there by undeserving
> owners for no good or legitimate reason. Convenience is the usual
> line of reasoning.

No arguement here been ther done that and have rescued two dogs over the 
years myself and been with others toselect their new pet.

 >Convenience and the hope of turning a quick profit

Having a dog for 2 years then selling it at "..best offer  " is not "QUICK" 
or for a "PROFIT"

> appears to be the case in this case in point. If the original poster
> genuinely cared about the dog, it would be offered up free-to-good-
> home.

I think he does giving something FREE ensures an impulse "BUY" having 
someone pay a ..best offer  at least ensures some thought has gone into the 
"BUY"

 It is, as Mr Krusty implied, a shame that it isn't the owners
> going on to death row.

I repeat you have not thought this through very well at all maybe the world 
would be a safer place if violent people like you were "> going on to death 
row "