🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.pets
Article #8227

Re: RSPCA Adoption Charges

#8227
From: Noodle
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 00:00
13 lines
1293 bytes
I think that is a real bad idea to put prices on animals from the RSPCA.
If people were thinking of getting a pet for the family they would get 
one else where, like if a family wanted a dog they would buy a pup, but a 
pup may cost some money and the person who is paying for the pup may 
dislike the condition of paying for a dog when you can get one free of 
charge from the RSPCA. So this person would get their dog from the RSPCA.
But if you were to slap a price on animals from the RSPCA, well not as 
many animals would find a home because why buy a fully growen dog from 
the the RSPCA when you could buy a puppie elsewhere?

Ian Winter

Ian@Noodle.Demom.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID: <824655593.6559@noodle.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <DIxJ4C.BA6@gil.com.au> <4e59pv$eld@grissom.powerup.com.au> <4fmfko$d7o@canb.cin.gov.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1062c1,fc97c8c6570f6ce1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1062c1,public
From: Noodle@Noodle.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: RSPCA  Adoption Charges
Date: 1996/02/18
Message-ID: <824655593.6559@noodle.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 139893413
x-nntp-posting-host: noodle.demon.co.uk
references: <DIxJ4C.BA6@gil.com.au> <4e59pv$eld@grissom.powerup.com.au> <4fmfko$d7o@canb.cin.gov.au>
to: kpalmer@cin.gov.au
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Winters Caravans
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: aus.pets
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)