Re: Insults [?]

Article View: aus.pets

Article #8280

#8280

From: Shane Baker
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:00

26 lines
1226 bytes

plden@alinga.newcastle.edu.au (D.Nesmith) wrote:

>A random thought, inspired by the RSPCA correspondence:

>One poster 'bitched' about the problem; another complained about the
>'mongrels' who dumped unwanted pets.

>Bitches and mongrels are among my best friends.  I protest that using
>such nouns as pejoratives is politically incorrect.  Any comments or
>suggestions for alternatives?

>Dorrit :-)

Don't forget:   "This program's a dog" and the like!

I agree - let's bite the next one who misuses doggy words!!

:-)}

Shane
_______________________________________________________________
Shane Baker  -  sbaker@pcug.org.au
Read aus.pets - for an Aussie perspective on pet ownership
Australian Dog Page:  http://www.pcug.org.au/~sbaker/dogs.htm
Canberra - Australia's National Capital.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4e4mvu$f1a@supreme.pcug.org.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4dmdpe$adj@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1062c1,78ba8479853d4833,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1062c1,public
From: sbaker@pcug.org.au (Shane Baker)
Subject: Re: Insults [?]
Date: 1996/01/24
Message-ID: <4e4mvu$f1a@supreme.pcug.org.au>
X-Deja-AN: 136372367
references: <4dmdpe$adj@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>
organization: AUUG Inc. (Canberra) & PCUG (ACT) Inc.
newsgroups: aus.pets

Reply to Parent Message