Article View: aus.pets
Article #8364Re: RSPCA Adoption and Vet Charges
From: Mike Owen
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00
50 lines
3298 bytes
3298 bytes
Comparing vets and doctors is really rather pointless - both go through an extensive training period but the similarity ends there, especially in the area of responsibility. If a bad vet (and there are a lot out there, especially with birds, my speciality) makes a mistake there is a dead pet and an upset family, but absolutely nothing happens to the vet. If a doctor makes a mistake and there is a dead person then all hell can break loose and the doctor may lose his livelihood. I only recently had a customer who had taken a sick budgie to a vet who diagnosed, on the basis of no pathology or tests, coccidiosis and worms and prescribed suitable drugs for the perceived problems. A week later the bird was bought to me just before it died. From its symptoms I diagnosed megabacteria, a very different disease, and this was confirmed by a veterinary autopsy which I paid for. When I phoned the original vet she said "whats megabacteria?", and it was only a $10 budgie so what did it matter! Given the correct diagnosis that bird would almost certainly have survived and made a full recovery. Its a bit like a doctor diagnosing flu when you have foaming at the mouth rabies! Another vet in my area ALWAYS diagnoses any sick parrot as having chlamydiosis, without tests and no matter what the symptoms. Of course this requires a 6 week course of quite expensive medication to cure so no doubt that has a bearing on the diagnosis. Fortunately for him the drug is pretty good at treating other problems as well, with only a weeks' treatment so he often gets away with it. Having had a go at vets, I have to say that the good caring vets far outnumber the bad, and that their charges are not excessive considering the costs involved in running a surgery. Similarly the fees charged even by the Qld RSPCA are not high in my opinion. If anyone is not able or willing to pay $100 for a dog then they are not able to afford to feed, keep and pay necessary vet bills for that dog. I would bet that there is a close relationship between the cost of the dog and its likelihood of being dumped. By the way, by what authority do vets, with a Batchelor of Veterinary Science, call themselves Doctor? I seem to remember that 20 or 30 years ago the vets were always Mr. (not many women vets back then). Does that mean that someone with a Batchelor of Science in say physics can also call him(her)self Doctor? cheers, Mike Owen (who actually doesn't hate vets and even has some as friends). -- Cheers, Mike Owen, Mooloolaba, Queensland, Australia. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - to see where Mooloolaba is try:- http://peg.pegasus.oz.au/~futurecom/map.htm
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cbe0n$dvb@peg.apc.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4cab6s$rfi@hercules.its.csiro.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1062c1,7b7174ea602e60cf,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1062c1,public From: Mike Owen <mowen@peg.apc.org> Subject: Re: RSPCA Adoption and Vet Charges Date: 1996/01/02 Message-ID: <4cbe0n$dvb@peg.apc.org> X-Deja-AN: 133696057 references: <4cab6s$rfi@hercules.its.csiro.au> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Mooloolaba Aquarium & Aviary Centre mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: aus.pets x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)