Re: RSPCA Adoption and Vet Charges

Article View: aus.pets

Article #8368

#8368

From: Barbara Maple
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 00:00

18 lines
1251 bytes

Mike Owen <mowen@peg.apc.org> wrote:

Hulo there Mike.

>Having had a go at vets, I have to say that the good caring vets far 
>outnumber the bad, and that their charges are not excessive considering 
>the costs involved in running a surgery.  Similarly the fees charged even 
>by the Qld RSPCA are not high in my opinion.  If anyone is not able or 
>willing to pay $100 for a dog then they are not able to afford to feed, 
>keep and pay necessary vet bills for that dog.  I would bet that there is 
>a close relationship between the cost of the dog and its likelihood of 
>being dumped.

   I tried to point this out to him about a month ago,  This was when
this series of messages started.   It was no go,   It is good to see
that people think the same way as I do,

Barbara Maple

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4cetjh$db9@wombat.melbpc.org.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4cab6s$rfi@hercules.its.csiro.au> <4cbe0n$dvb@peg.apc.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1062c1,7b7174ea602e60cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid1062c1,public
From: barbaram@melbpc.org.au (Barbara Maple)
Subject: Re: RSPCA Adoption and Vet Charges
Date: 1996/01/04
Message-ID: <4cetjh$db9@wombat.melbpc.org.au>
X-Deja-AN: 133826248
references: <4cab6s$rfi@hercules.its.csiro.au> <4cbe0n$dvb@peg.apc.org>
organization: Melbourne PC User Group Inc, Australia
newsgroups: aus.pets

Reply to Parent Message