Article View: aus.polics
Article #21Re: Another Bloody Commercial Channel
From: doug buckser
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 00:00
53 lines
2924 bytes
2924 bytes
G'day Ian, iw@emphasys.com.au (Ian Williamson) wrote: >There is a great deal that is very shakey about Kennet's envolvement (and the >Liberal Party), if you choose not to see it, fine. Proof is another issue. I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean that you intuitively feel that Kennett is dirty, but you don't have evidence to support your views at this time? >Proof of guilt is determined by a court of law and not the ABC (or Sixty >Minutes :-). It is however the role of the media to question. I'll refer to the last sentence at the end of this message. >>>The ABC is _not_ analagous to PBS .. and should never be marginalised into >>>that role. > >>Why not? (Seriously, I'm not baiting you.) > >Concentration of media is a problem in this country. I'm afraid that I don't see the link between the previous sentence and your reply. PBS is a government-funded network in America that accepts a percentage of commercial sponsorship (as opposed to commercials). It's not immediately clear to me what this has to do with concentration of media ownership in Australia. >Commercial interests compromise integrety on any subject. Always have and >always will. Again, I'm not sure that this statement is self-evident. For example, SBS has accepted sponsorship for some time. Could you identify where the network's integrity has been compromised? >If you fail to see the danger of commercial interests being envolved in >ABC funding I have to seriously consider whether it is worth a reply. As you noted earlier, I thought questioning was A Good Thing. Or does this apply only to issues which -you'd- like to question? If so, would you mind listing the other subjects and/or issues which you believe should be accepted without question by the general population? Doug - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. -- Dave Barry douglas.buckser@acslink.aone.net.au
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<320711f1.3981545@news.mel.aone.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<iw.304.000DD6C2@emphasys.com.au> <31f02c67.2756796@news.mel.aone.net.au> <iw.301.000D6AC2@emphasys.com.au> <31ee27f0.7095109@news.mel.aone.net.au> <iw.293.0009C6D1@emphasys.com.au> <31f35e97.8186520@news.mel.aone.net.au> <HO79xAEIBh107h@mtpos <iw.339.000E9A9A@emphasys.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 15f2b3,211d7182539ec78 X-Google-Attributes: gid15f2b3,public X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,211d7182539ec78 X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public From: douglas.buckser@acslink.aone.net.au (doug buckser) Subject: Re: Another Bloody Commercial Channel Date: 1996/08/06 Message-ID: <320711f1.3981545@news.mel.aone.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 172436483 references: <iw.304.000DD6C2@emphasys.com.au> <31f02c67.2756796@news.mel.aone.net.au> <iw.301.000D6AC2@emphasys.com.au> <31ee27f0.7095109@news.mel.aone.net.au> <iw.293.0009C6D1@emphasys.com.au> <31f35e97.8186520@news.mel.aone.net.au> <HO79xAEIBh107h@mtpos <iw.339.000E9A9A@emphasys.com.au> organization: ADU Consulting Group Pty Ltd newsgroups: aus.polics,aus.general