🚀 go-pugleaf

kangarooistan wrote:
> Lets open a file on this IMPOSTER
>
> Gather his posts and find out who he is
>
>  aus.politics > So will all the MAD lefties now apologize - View Parsed
>
>
> Show only message text
>
> Path:
> g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!79g2000cws.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: "Jake Mccrann" <e...@post.com>
> Newsgroups: aus.politics
> Subject: So will all the MAD lefties now apologize
> Date: 30 Nov 2006 13:22:34 -0800
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 12
> Message-ID: <1164921753.970285.195420@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.7.166.174
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1164921759 25318 127.0.0.1 (30 Nov 2006
> 21:22:39 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:22:39 +0000 (UTC)
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
> (R1 1.5); .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 syd-pow-pr11.tpg.com.au:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE3)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> Injection-Info: 79g2000cws.googlegroups.com;
> posting-host=202.7.166.174;
>    posting-account=bguD3g0AAAAohIG8sT9EbXb-d0kuNbwk
>
> Over the past few weeks we have had all the MAD lefties, IE Hunt, Serge
> etc state that the Kim leadership challenge is non existant and a
> product of liberal party propoganda.
>
> This was pointed out to be wrong but the MAD lefties continued.
>
> It is now patently obvious that it was a Labor party plot.
>
> Will you call Rudd/Kimbo liars, will you apologise for your lies?
>
> Will you just continue with more mad bullshit

Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Jake Mccrann" <e...@post.com>
Newsgroups: aus.politics
Subject: Re: You guys just Dont get the new AWA/IR rules
Date: 30 Nov 2006 23:52:38 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <1164959558.602792.12820@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1164930108.010205.4230@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>
   <SSQbh.682$HU.591@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.7.166.173
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1164959563 22175 127.0.0.1 (1 Dec 2006
07:52:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:52:43 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <SSQbh.682$HU.591@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
(R1 1.5); .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 syd-pow-pr10.tpgi.com.au:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE3)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=202.7.166.173;
   posting-account=bguD3g0AAAAohIG8sT9EbXb-d0kuNbwk


> Mary lives in Parramatta. She is being offered a good job at a bank in
> Bondi. After working there for 6 months, mary decides that it is best to
> sell her house and buy another one close to her job. Two weeks later the
> boss tells her, sorry, but i have to let you go. I have a distant relative
> who wants your job.

Dream on, It has never happened and it will never happen. Havent you
read that larger companies DO Fall into the unfair dismissal act.
>
> John gets a job in a store working overtime and on weekends. After working
> there for 2 years, he decides to get a loan and buy a house. Then the boss
> tells him, i have to let you go, but i can rehire you and offer you a new
> contract. You will get a dollar increase in your pat, but no more penalty
> rates for overtime and weekend work. John looses $200 per week and as a
> result he looses his house.


Thast why we have AWA's so that the conditions ar5e spelt out in
adavance. You are making up the impossible stories to suit your
philosophies.

One day you are told: We  don't like your face and you are no longer
welcome at this pub.

How does the IR reform accept that.

> The young one doesn't want you because by now you have become an ugly old
> man.

How does the IR reform accept that.


> Liz is working as a check out girl. Someone times her and finds that she is
> a bit faster than the average. So they give her an extra 20 cents an hour.
> At the head office they make up the wages of 1000 check out girls in their
> stores. As each girl has different wages, different working conditions, some
> getting holiday, some not getting it etc. etc. they have to emplpoy another
> 10 Acountants to make up the pay packets.
> If you believe there are work choices and individual work contracts then you
> are more stupid than you look.


No, you have computers to do that, Its not that hard.
>
> No, the losers are the bosses. If he gives me a lousy pay then that is the
> way I treat his clients.

Then why are you worried if it only affects the bosses.




 
Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy