🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.rail.models
Article #123

Re: Why paint items in historic liveries?

#123
From: Fred Morley
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 04:57
86 lines
5119 bytes
I will throw my 6 penneth worth the colour of the 38's were battle ship grey
,we used to go and look at them during lunch break at Broadmeadow high
school, (student there  1945-1948 )which was just over the fence if you
could find it.
FredMorley
"Terry Flynn" <tgflynn@unsw.edu.au> wrote in message
news:d5ujqj$rg1$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au...
>
>
>
> "Hunslet" <hunslet@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:rq1581ho5gh7src2eai5l9njqc34frsq1i@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:11:45 +1000, mark_newton
> > <mark_newton@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > >Greg Rudd wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I will speculate that it was more likely either a grey being used
> > > >> by the Navy at the time or the dark grey used on goods wagons. (no
> > > >> documentary evidence to support either theory). My evidence is a
> > > >> colour print from a book published in 1946.
> > >
> > > > Which being from a print published in a book would be of dubious
> > > > worth except as a record,but you knew that, expert. On this one I
> > > > would put my money on Pete's explanation pending new evidence if it
> > > > comes to light.
> > >
> > >Once again Greg, our "friend" demonstrates how little he understands
> > >about colour printing, and it's limitations.
> >
> >
> > I will have to support Mark.   I have had a look at the particular
> > book and the illustration.   Despite the indication that it is a
> > "natural" colour photo, I would have to question this as it appears to
> > have been hand tinted.
> >
>
> Mark Newton has demonstrated and addmitted he now's nothing about the
colour
> of the 38 class locomotive. His opinion should be treated as irrelevent,
he
> is a bitter and twisted bully.  The process is largely irrelevent in this
> case, as we are talking about Grey. The print clearly shows carriages in
> russet and red, the red is a good representation. Thus we have more
> reference points compared to black and white prints.
>
> > For those who wish to check it out, the book is "The Australian Book
> > of Trains", by J H & W D Martin, published by Angus & Robertson in
> > 1947 and the colour plate, described as - The "Newcastle Flyer" on
> > Hawkesbury Bridge, natural colour photo by Don Martin) is facing page
> > 226.  The book is thought to be the first "real" publication on
> > Australian railways.
> >
> > This particular photograph shows 3801 to be quite a dark gray, whilst
> > other black and white photos suggest that the gray is considerably
> > lighter.
> >
> > Hunslet
> >
>
> It depends on which black and white prints you look at. It's a problem
with
> black and white prints, to work out how dark or light the grey is. This is
> why this colour print is more useful. It clearly shows the grey to be
> reasonably dark, could be a result of in service dirt. However  3801 is
> slightly lighter than the carriage red, and lighter than the dirty
carriage
> roofs, indicating a reasonably clean locomotive and tender. It's much
darker
> than cement grey of the bridge abutments. With the absence of alternative
> evidence, this is the best reference I have to the colour used. It's more
> useful than Mark Newton's nothing.
>
>
> --
> Terry Flynn
>
>
> http://angelfire.com/clone/rail/index.html
>
> HO wagon weight and locomotive tractive effort estimates
>
> DC control circuit diagrams
>
> HO scale track standards
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4282e584_1@news.iprimus.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsfeed.inode.at!texta.sil.at!quokka.wn.com.au!token.pipenetworks.com!218.100.2.58.MISMATCH!not-for-mail
References: <425e828f$0$5594$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d4s8ip$3va$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <427762bb$0$4658$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d59fk0$b07$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <42785394$0$8122$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <9mtg71983m025r5up0iku01dvgi7mvu1p1@4ax.com> <4278b707$0$8123$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <tkji71hre02934ies2hn4h8jmolueb8mi0@4ax.com> <d5pac1$1av$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <d5pn6r$la9$1@spacebar.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <42820491.3030907@optusnet.com.au> <rq1581ho5gh7src2eai5l9njqc34frsq1i@4ax.com> <d5ujqj$rg1$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: ff544,6e326105708be153
X-Google-Thread: 11469f,23ad492e934f702d
X-Google-Attributes: gidff544,gid11469f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "Fred Morley" <fredmore@kooee.com.au>
Newsgroups: aus.rail.models,aus.rail
References: <425e828f$0$5594$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d4s8ip$3va$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <427762bb$0$4658$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <d59fk0$b07$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <42785394$0$8122$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <9mtg71983m025r5up0iku01dvgi7mvu1p1@4ax.com> <4278b707$0$8123$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <tkji71hre02934ies2hn4h8jmolueb8mi0@4ax.com> <d5pac1$1av$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au> <d5pn6r$la9$1@spacebar.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <42820491.3030907@optusnet.com.au> <rq1581ho5gh7src2eai5l9njqc34frsq1i@4ax.com> <d5ujqj$rg1$1@tomahawk.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Why paint items in historic liveries?
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:57:45 +1000
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.27.13.214
Message-ID: <4282e584_1@news.iprimus.com.au>
Organization: iPrimus Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@iprimus.com.au
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
Lines: 88
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.134.67.67
X-Trace: 1115874695 un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au 27625 203.134.67.67:4149
X-Complaints-To: Abuse, including message IDs to abuse@pipenetworks.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsfeed.inode.at!texta.sil.at!quokka.wn.com.au!token.pipenetworks.com!218.100.2.58.MISMATCH!not-for-mail