🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.rail.models
Article #189

Re: plate frames v bar frams etc........

#189
From: Greg Rudd
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 03:20
33 lines
2506 bytes
Beowulf wrote:

> salv�
>     Dear all,
> Seeing as how this isnt quite to do with paints any longer ...... A quick
> word on plate frames, according to J.C.Gibson who I mentioned previously
> plate frames tended to crack about the horns when the loco was being
> lifted for maintainance due mainly it seems to not enough metal being used
> over the horn gaps to reinforce them in such a situation, they also
> cracked it seems when the springs lost their springiness and the axle
> boxes smacked into the frame at high velocities bending the frame and
> eventually cracking it at this point.(Horn gaps), he doesnt mention bar
> frames except in relationship to Deans pony trucks.(GWR) and as I'm not an
> engineer.... anyway I thought this might be of interest as JC Gibson
> before he became a Cof E Vicar was enmployed by the GWR as a fitter in
> their erecting and repair shops so he ought to know :) I assume Australian
> practice cant have been too dissimilar to UK practice? or am I wrong...I
> await the tirades with baited breath and have my garlic ready to ward off
> the nasty's :) Beowulf

I actually enjoy your posts to be truthfull ;-)  

I would not be using the GWR necessaraly as a reference point for locomotive
innovation as in a lot of area's they really trailed behind in their
designs.  But don't tell Terry Flynn that.


-- 
Spam Bait

�john.howard@aph.gov.au
minister@transport.nsw.gov.au
alanjones@2gb.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <cpb4pi$im8$1@spacebar.ucc.usyd.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.usyd.edu.au!not-for-mail
References: <Fi6ud.3076$Of5.2252@nntpserver.swip.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: ff544,d845881a93d484e2
X-Google-Thread: 11469f,b902124822d91b52,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidff544,gid11469f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.usyd.edu.au!not-for-mail
From: Greg Rudd <grudd@usyd.edu.au>
Newsgroups: aus.rail.models,aus.rail
Subject: Re: plate frames v bar frams etc........
Followup-To: aus.rail.models
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:20:43 +1100
Organization: The University of Sydney, Australia
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <cpb4pi$im8$1@spacebar.ucc.usyd.edu.au>
References: <Fi6ud.3076$Of5.2252@nntpserver.swip.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: esu-5.ucc.usyd.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: spacebar.ucc.usyd.edu.au 1102648946 19144 129.78.65.8 (10 Dec 2004 03:22:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.usyd.edu.au
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Dec 2004 03:22:26 GMT
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7