Article View: aus.science
Article #1003Re: Salt in the diet
From: kym
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:40
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:40
134 lines
5592 bytes
5592 bytes
kym@kymhorsell.com wrote: [...] Here's the kind of thing you can find with google searching. The EU gather stats on dietary salt consumption (as do many countries checking dietary iodine in salt -- an Aussie invention I understand). You can run an OLS against life expectancy and see if there's a statistically significant link. Even on this randomly-selected data there is such a link. Here's the output: eusaltcons: table I Zbigniew Szybiski et al. eusaltcons: salt cons g.dat life.dat: highest life exp life.dat: 1990-95 life.dat: the economist pocket world in figures p64 eusaltcons vs life.dat NOTES: 52 missing x values discarded avx 9.250000 sdx 1.705137 (= 18.433918% of avx) rangex 7.900000..13.500000 (= 60.540540% of avx) avy 75.500000 sdy 1.414214 (= 1.873131% of avy) rangey 72.000000..77.000000 (= 6.622517% of avy) 2 (25.0%) points > 1 \sigma y = -0.778166*x + 82.698 sdx 4.82286 rss 1.9153 se 0.564993 r -0.938246 limits for beta at 90.0% CI tc = 1.94317 at 6 d.f. beta in -0.778166 +- 0.22764 = [-1.00581, -0.550525] T-tests on beta: H0 beta == 0.000000 against H1 beta != 0.000000 calculated t = -6.64253 at 6 d.f. |t| > tc (1.94317 2-sided); reject H0 H0 beta == 0.000000 against H1 beta < 0.000000 t < tc (-1.43975 left tail); reject H0 Probabilities: P(beta!=0.000000) = 0.999438 P(beta<0.000000) = 0.999719 limits for alpha at 90.0% CI tc = 1.94317 at 6 d.f. alpha in 82.698 +- 2.14115 = [80.5569, 84.8392] r2 = 0.880307 tag x y yp france 7.9 77 76.5505 germany 8.2 76 76.3171 denmark 8.2 76 76.3171 belgium 8.3 76 76.2393 portugal 9 75 75.6945 italy 9.2 76 75.5389 uk 9.7 76 75.1498 poland 13.5 72 72.1928 This shows that there is a variation in life expectancy across the countries that has a 88% corressponding variation in dietary salt consumption. It finds that for each g of salt consumped per day there is a corresponding reduction of .77 years of life expectancy. The probability that this -ve correlation is due to chance alone is almost 0. (I.e. Pr(beta<0) is 99.9%!) Since this is aus.science we can't leave even this simple test there. The UK is an outlier in the data. It may be skewing the results. So let's remove it: avx 9.185714 sdx 1.813782 (= 19.745685% of avx) rangex 7.900000..13.500000 (= 60.964233% of avx) avy 75.428574 sdy 1.498189 (= 1.986235% of avy) rangey 72.000000..77.000000 (= 6.628788% of avy) 3 (42.9%) points > 1 \sigma y = -0.797121*x + 82.7507 sdx 4.79881 rss 1.08096 se 0.464963 r -0.964963 limits for beta at 90.0% CI tc = 2.01505 at 5 d.f. beta in -0.797121 +- 0.195241 = [-0.992362, -0.601879] T-tests on beta: H0 beta == 0.000000 against H1 beta != 0.000000 calculated t = -8.22695 at 5 d.f. |t| > tc (2.01505 2-sided); reject H0 H0 beta == 0.000000 against H1 beta < 0.000000 t < tc (-1.47589 left tail); reject H0 Probabilities: P(beta!=0.000000) = 0.999568 P(beta<0.000000) = 0.999784 limits for alpha at 90.0% CI tc = 2.01505 at 5 d.f. alpha in 82.7507 +- 1.82806 = [80.9226, 84.5788] r2 = 0.931152 tag x y yp france 7.9 77 76.4534 germany 8.2 76 76.2143 denmark 8.2 76 76.2143 belgium 8.3 76 76.1346 portugal 9 75 75.5766 italy 9.2 76 75.4172 poland 13.5 72 71.9896 The fit now is even better. 93% of the variation in salt consumption has a corresponding variation in life expectancy. I.e. for each 1 g of salt consumed per day there is .79 less years of life expectancy. As I said, this is only a very cursory "study". :) But there are many many similar studies around. You can do any similar thing yourself to check whether you can find evidence there is or is not a problem with excessive levels of salt consumption. Using data on heart attack, stoke, cancer or various specialisations of these (e.g. stomach cancer in particular) you can narrow down what may be the specific problems that cause life expectancy to have the above prima facie link. -- R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cc212b4$0$13361$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<ugkwo.179$gM3.26@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <4cc1f373$0$17526$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: db42311052,8e4bf36c0c01f102
X-Google-Attributes: giddb42311052,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
Sender: Charlie Root <root@duo2.kym.com>
Message-ID: <4cc212b4$0$13361$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
From: kym@kymhorsell.com
Subject: Re: Salt in the diet
Newsgroups: aus.science
References: <ugkwo.179$gM3.26@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <4cc1f373$0$17526$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
Organization: kymhorsell.com
Reply-To: kym@kymhorsell.com
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (OpenBSD/4.7 (i386))
Date: 22 Oct 2010 22:40:02 GMT
Lines: 134
NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.74.221.139
X-Trace: 1287787202 13361 114.74.221.139