Article View: aus.science
Article #3799Re: Natural Philosophy
From: nos
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:55
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:55
66 lines
3465 bytes
3465 bytes
also because i still don't have RSI... Descent of Man 2nd Ed. p 161 'It has been known that in the vertebrate kingdom one sex bears rudiments of various accessory parts appertaining to the reproductive system, which properly belong to the opposite sex ....... Some remote progenitor of the whole vertebrate kingdom appears to have been hermaphrodite and androgynous.......But here we counter a singular difficulty. In the mammalian class the males possess rudiments of a uterus with the adjacent passages in the Vesiculae prostatica; they bear also rudiments of mammae, ans some male marsupials have traces of a marsupial sac. Other analogous facts could be added. Are we then to suppose that some extremely ancient mammal continued androgynous after it had acquired the chief distinctions of its class, and therefore after it had diverged from the lower classes of the vertebrate kingdom? This seems very improbable , for we have to look to the fishes, the lowest of all the classes, to find any still existent androgynous forms' if you put an embryo of six week old dog next to that of an eight year old human you would hardly notice the differences. Has an ape fossil ever been found older than the oldest human fossil? nos "nos" <nos@granite.net.au> wrote in message news:aeh37.6$2D3.4796@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net... > > "Daniel" <sorry@idontwant.spam> wrote in message > news:9iil4g$ibn$1@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au... > > nos <nos@granite.net.au> wrote in message > > news:ytR27.49$Ab3.10626@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net... > > > > > I think though that a lot of teaching doesn't explain well enough that > > most > > > of science is in fact theories. Often such as in evolution - it is > > accepted > > > as card hold fact when in fact there are too many anomolies with the > whole > > > theory. > > > > You don't think evolution happens? Granted, there are theories as to the > > *mechanism*, but surely the *existence* of evolution itself is not > > questionable? > > > > Daniel > > > > Hi - Save going through the whole thing again - try the URL in the 'Origin > of the Ape' post. > > otherwise a link can be found here as well : > http://www.wisdomworld.org/additional/ListOfCollatedArticles/index.html > > namaste > > nos > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1Qi37.14$2D3.7681@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!203.50.2.79!intgwlon.nntp.telstra.net!nsw.nnrp.telstra.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<oAL17.24100$e5.68968@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <6YK27.25957$e5.83862@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <ytR27.49$Ab3.10626@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <9iil4g$ibn$1@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au> <aeh37.6$2D3.4796@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd648,d8ae7f7e6a186f3d X-Google-Attributes: gidfd648,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-12 07:51:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!203.50.2.79!intgwlon.nntp.telstra.net!nsw.nnrp.telstra.net!not-for-mail From: "nos" <nos@granite.net.au> Newsgroups: aus.science References: <oAL17.24100$e5.68968@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <6YK27.25957$e5.83862@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <ytR27.49$Ab3.10626@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <9iil4g$ibn$1@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au> <aeh37.6$2D3.4796@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> Subject: Re: Natural Philosophy Lines: 68 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Message-ID: <1Qi37.14$2D3.7681@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:25:08 +0930 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.38.211.77 X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 994949501 203.38.211.77 (Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:51:41 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:51:41 EST Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct