Article View: aus.science
Article #3838Re: Presence and effects of the dominant Pe gene in Fancy rats
From: ogier
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:55
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:55
48 lines
2911 bytes
2911 bytes
> Thanks Oggie, I hope this has made some sense. > > Cheers, Ana It will all sink into my brain eventually. :-) One thing though - I don't know that the loss of all babies can be attributed to the PePe lethality. If both rats were Pepe, then theory would say that the following is the likely Pearl gene status of the offspring: 25% PePe (fatal) 50% Pepe (pearl showing if mink present) 25% pepe (non-pearl). The odds say that you should have a reduced size litter. Not a completely aborted litter. Mind you, nature can do some strange things so it is possible that 100% of the offspring would have been PePe (fatal). (yes, I am thinking this through as I type) :-) Another possibility is that the genetically lethal condition occurred in the fetus closest to the birth canal, preventing a successful labour. If a genetically lethal mix of the pearl gene occurs, what occurs to the zygote/fetus? I believed that it would be reabsorbed, but can a fetus reach near term with this fatal gene before actually dying, preventing reabsorbtion due to the maturity of the fetus? From our recent mink lines, we know of 4 girls (1 of them twice) that have had either failed births or failed to become pregnant. We're waiting to hear results of the 5th girl and a boy is in reserve until we can have some confidence in the line's ability to breed healthily. Cheers, Oggy. p.s. some links with pearling info that I've been reading and you may enjoy: http://www.bubblegunners.org/hawthorn/articles/mink_breeding.html http://www.users.wineasy.se/dan.johansson/Eva/rat/gen/honung.htm http://www.geocities.com/Petsburgh/7989/rats/genetics.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3B179EA5.F77BF854@optushome.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.xtra.co.nz!news.mel.connect.com.au!newshub1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au!news1.blktn1.nsw.optushome.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<14hugt8gdl9a737bq0sdtkhuqg8f2m316l@4ax.com> <3B165397.ECD4537E@optushome.com.au> <gb0dhtoiijh5kmns54potd277kda2be0p5@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd648,59dfecfb2fe96c18 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd648,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-01 06:55:46 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.xtra.co.nz!news.mel.connect.com.au!newshub1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au!news1.blktn1.nsw.optushome.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3B179EA5.F77BF854@optushome.com.au> From: ogier <ogier@optushome.com.au> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: aus.science Subject: Re: Presence and effects of the dominant Pe gene in Fancy rats References: <14hugt8gdl9a737bq0sdtkhuqg8f2m316l@4ax.com> <3B165397.ECD4537E@optushome.com.au> <gb0dhtoiijh5kmns54potd277kda2be0p5@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 48 Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:55:45 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.180.110 X-Complaints-To: abuse@optushome.com.au X-Trace: news1.blktn1.nsw.optushome.com.au 991403745 203.164.180.110 (Fri, 01 Jun 2001 23:55:45 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 23:55:45 EST Organization: @Home Network