🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.science
Article #910

Re: Death of Doctor Who?

#910
From: DonH
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 04:16
33 lines
3016 bytes
"DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> wrote in message 
news:uhrfq.3003$NR2.2772@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
> It seems that "there are only two episodes until death of the Doctor"; so, 
> will the longest running SF series on TV finally come to an end?
>  Or, will it be, as Mark Twain said, "The reports of my death are greatly 
> exaggerated."
>  Of course, the good Doctor has died many times before, but has 
> reincarnated every time - since 1963.  This time it looks final, as even a 
> Time Lord is mortal, and runs out of options.
>   Perhaps the time-travel concept has exhausted its possibilities, or 
> maybe BBC can no longer afford the production unit.
>   But why should we bewail the death of someone who never existed in the 
> first place?
>   Maybe, as with Sherlock Holmes, public demand will insist on a Return?
>   Or, there may be a sigh of relief that the Doc has gone at last.
>   The Doctor is an Alien, if in human form, so maybe death will reveal his 
> true appearance?
>

# Well, it seems the Doctor has survived this "final" episode, by a bit of 
trickery (borrowed from movie "Meet Dave"?), and this BBC money-spinner will 
go on for yet another season.
    Indeed, not even reincarnation was involved, so we assume Matt Smith 
retains the role.
    However, it is possible that Doctor Who's options are narrowing, as the 
Daleks have been killed off, along with all other Time Lords (except a 
couple of baddies). Gallifrey is defunct.
    And after this episode, the Doc may have to keep a low profile - as he 
is supposed to be dead.
    But the Doctor has been in tighter corners than this, and who expects 
too much logic and consistency in any time travel fiction?  The basic 
concept involves umpteen contradictions.
    (Try "The Terminator" series, if you have any doubts.) 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Me9kq.3837$NR2.219@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
References: <uhrfq.3003$NR2.2772@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: db42311052,7f26609089b78acf
X-Google-Attributes: giddb42311052,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com>
Newsgroups: aus.science
References: <uhrfq.3003$NR2.2772@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>
Subject: Re: Death of Doctor Who?
Lines: 35
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <Me9kq.3837$NR2.219@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:16:32 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.181.120.21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com 1318133804 124.181.120.21 (Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:16:44 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:16:44 EST
Organization: BigPond