Article View: aus.science
Article #992Re: Murray-Darling Basin
From: DonH
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:41
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:41
44 lines
3361 bytes
3361 bytes
"DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:YPrqo.1068$Bv4.528@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
> So, the Murray-Darling area had lots of rain this year.
> Is the drought now broken, and happy days are here again?
> Or is it unwise to generalise on one instance?
> Will, the rains come next year, and year after, etc?
> Maybe, play it safe, and plan accordingly - as there is no surety in all
> this?
> Which has priority - the River, or the Irrigators?
> And can the lesser reaches, which affect Adelaide, be ignored, as of
> little account?
> Will river Redgums, almost dead due to prolonged water deprivation,
> revive; or are they too far gone, and who cares anyway?
> Yeah, lots of questions. Let's not rush the answers.
>
# Here are some questions, relating to Irrigators:
(1) How many such farmers exist now, as compared to, say, 50 years ago?
(That is, what may have been sustainable then may not be now, given that
no extra rivers have come into existence; as a quid pro quo.)
(2) What practices are used by irrigators?
E.g. open channel (as compare to pipes), and overhead sprinklers
(compared to drip-feeding)?
(3) Are tropical crops, such as rice, still grown in this temperate zone?
(Rice needs lots of water, and tropics can supply this, in open paddy
fields, where evaporation is high).
(4) Are foodstuffs grown for export? If so, can this be discontinued, with
sales solely for home consumption, and farmers still be viable?
(5) Should any "righteous indignation" of farmers be directed at coal-fired
power-station owners, rather than at scientists merely doing their job?
(If erratic weather patterns now prevail, then who is to blame if drought
is followed by flood?)
(6) If government is to compensate for loss of water entitlements, and maybe
loss of jobs, income, etc - then why the gripe?
(7) If too little is done to save the river system, then not only may rivers
cease to exist, but also farmers dependent on them?
(Without Ecology there is no Economy).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ItKro.1316$hz6.204@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<YPrqo.1068$Bv4.528@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd648,39a8e6a43eeefcf5 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: giddb42311052,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!exi-spool.telstra.net!exi-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> Newsgroups: aus.science References: <YPrqo.1068$Bv4.528@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> Subject: Re: Murray-Darling Basin Lines: 46 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: <ItKro.1316$hz6.204@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 06:41:28 +1100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.176.177.232 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com 1286566888 124.176.177.232 (Sat, 09 Oct 2010 06:41:28 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 06:41:28 EST Organization: BigPond