Thread View: aus.science
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by DonH
Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:04
Periodic Classification of Elements
Author: DonH
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:04
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:04
13 lines
2055 bytes
2055 bytes
The question is why? Why periodic, that is? If a new element, from hydrogen onwards, is created or evolved, then why shouldn't it have entirely new characteristics from its predecessors? Unless, for any given dynamic (causal) universe, there is a limited number of functional features which are needed. Hence, recurrence of physical or chemical attributes tends to prevail. So, while Evolution of the Elements may involve accretion of more protons, neutron, electrons, etc, the result is not an infinite accompanying gain in characteristics, but a repeat in various ways - somewhat like adaptive radiation when one type of animal or plant replaces another in a given habitat. Except, in the case of the elements, it is supplemental. And when we reach Uranium, the accretion is so excessive as to be unstable.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads