🚀 go-pugleaf

So SBS TV, which we taxpayers bankroll, is airing a
sympathetic documentary about David Hicks, a convert to
Islam who is now "awaiting before a military tribunal at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba." Piers Akerman in the Sunday Telegraph
(Sydney - 14/03/04) has a few choice words about this
publicly-funded puff piece, but one section jumps out in
particular:

            [Hicks] also loved the fanatical Islamist notion
that the religion would sweep the world, subduing all those
who resisted.
            "Pakistan, Kashmir and Afghanistan (will) join
together in a true Islamic state. The Islamic state is
nearly completed. Love, David," he wrote.
            Hicks couldn't wait to fight the infidel, even
considering the possibility of martyrdom through death. "As
a Muslim, I believe in destiny. I will always fight for the
truth, Islam," he wrote.

Where did he, as a convert to Islam in Australia, get the
idea that a true Islamic state was being formed in central
Asia?

One may assume that his Islamic mentors instructed him to
read the Qur'an and other texts important to the faith.

Why did he miss all the "Islam is a religion of peace"
injunctions we keep hearing so much about?

Why didn't poor "mistranslated" and "misunderstood" Sheikh
Al-Hilaly explain to Hicks that all this Jihad talk was just
"poetry"?

Why won't Australian Muslims acknowledge that recruitment
for jihad goes on in their mosques, and embark on a
comprehensive program of reform?


Yours
"Storch"

web: http://targetaustralia.multiservers.com

......,,,