Article View: aus.sf
Article #2247Re: Farscape - Why would anybody watch it?
From: Duggy
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:16
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:16
57 lines
4015 bytes
4015 bytes
On Jul 30, 8:50 am, "Fleeced" <flee...@antispam.fleecedatmail.com> wrote: > "David Barnett" wrote: > > > I liked the show, have seen every episode in spite of Nine's erratic > > airing of the show, and was sorry when it ended. > > I did watch the first few shows when it aired, but they weren't that great - > and Nine moved it around before the main story arc kicked into gear, so > I gave up. I wish I hadn't. As you and I agree it began badly. And Nine certainly did some stupid things with this show (editing and aimming it at kids). But timeslots is a difficult thing. All too many times they get blamed for leaving a show to rot in a timeslot that isn't working for it. And if they move it around they get blamed for that - and yes, I agree it is easy to lose a show if it is shifted too much, If a show doesn't rate they're expected to keep playing it and lose themselves money to "give it a chance to grow an audience". Shows start slowly, take time to "get good" and the audience leaves before the show does... that isn't always the network's fault. You and I didn't like the show when it started. That's not Nine's fault. That is the makers. Look at Firefly. Fox are blamed for killing that show. I've heard people say they are still boycotting Fox for that - except for Dollhouse (which is weird, if Joss have forgiven Fox, why can't his fans)... They didn't show the original pilot (until much later). That's what pilots are. They're for the networks to decide what they do or don't like and what needs to be changed. Again look at Dollhouse. Fox didn't like the pilot, Joss made a better one. Once Fox got past the bad pilot Joss stuck them with and the bad follow-up need to introduce the Reavers, they jumped straight to the best episodes to catch the already dwindled audience. But no, the fans claim they should have played a bunch of crap episodes just to keep the tiny, barely noticable bits of continuity straight. And they they cancelled it "just when it was getting good". The 13 episode contract is pretty standard. It means that's when you're going to be cancelled then if you haven't got your audience. You need to get good way, way before that point. When Sarah Conner Chronicles was axed the someone said they'd talked to the showrunner and "season three was going to be our best season yet". It's easy to say that... but, why didn't they just make season 2 better? === = DUG. ===
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<abe655a8-b1f3-4b38-84ef-2cd0367db047@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4c517c34$0$21171$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <JXl4o.1969$FH2.1044@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <4c5205a2$0$32346$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f6172,52416a38dc73ab81 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10a774,52416a38dc73ab81 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid9461a05b3c,gid3ac807a62f,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Duggy <Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au> Newsgroups: aus.sf,aus.tv Subject: Re: Farscape - Why would anybody watch it? Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 57 Message-ID: <abe655a8-b1f3-4b38-84ef-2cd0367db047@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com> References: <4c517c34$0$21171$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <JXl4o.1969$FH2.1044@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <4c5205a2$0$32346$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.187.108.172 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1280621819 4150 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2010 00:16:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 00:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.187.108.172; posting-account=k4dZdgkAAACCq3qKCncuLwoQ3w6S6ePD User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MDDC),gzip(gfe)