Article View: aus.stats.s
Article #180Splus vs. Matlab
From: Bruce E. Wilson, Eastman Chemica...
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:28
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:28
20 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
jea@cvs.rochester.edu: >I have never used MATLAB but I use Splus quite a bit. >Can anyone out there with experience using both >describe what MATLAB might be better at doing than >Splus? In other words, can MATLAB perform any matrix >operations more easily than S? I tend to use Matlab when I need something that is clearly solveable as a Matrix problem. Matlab lacks the ability to deal with more than two subscripts and lacks the list and data.frame object types, which are required for some of my work. There are a few statistical functions in Matlab, but not very many. It has much better strengths in its toolboxes for dealing with signal processing and such like. I started using it before I started with S/Splus, so of course I tend to like it better. The fact that I learned Splus indicates that there are needs I had that were not met by Matlab (primarily dealing with data types other than rectangular arrays), but the fact that I go back is some evidence that Matlab does rectangular arrays better. Bruce Wilson (bewilson@kodak.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9301211424.AA25805@Kodak.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!dmssyd.syd.dms.CSIRO.AU!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: aus.stats.s Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!dmssyd.syd.dms.CSIRO.AU!news From: bewilson@kodak.com (Bruce E. Wilson, Eastman Chemical Company, (bewilson@kodak.com)) Subject: Splus vs. Matlab Message-ID: <9301211424.AA25805@Kodak.COM> X-Gateway: dmssyd.syd.dms.CSIRO.AU Lines: 20 Sender: daemon@syd.dms.CSIRO.AU Reply-To: bewilson@kodak.com Organization: CSIRO Div. Maths & Stats, CSIRO Div. Applied Physics Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:28:15 GMT