🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi all;
As you know I was disputing my speeding ticket of the 21/1/1995 
The Magistrate arrived at a verdict after about 4 hours ( including 1 hour for 
lunch).
The police officers' stories matched to the smallest detail which only means 
they discussed it thoroughly before coming to court and agreed on what to 
say.

The result was I lost.
However I didn't have to pay the witness's expences, only the original fine 
and court costs, which add to $182.70 instead of the original fine of 130 
bucks.  

My opinion is:
If you are  ever caught  in something like this, whether you were 
speeding or not, just pay the fine and get it over and done with.  
Unless of course you think your chances are high.  I am ready to give  info 
regarding my ordeal to anyone needing assistance.  

However, put it this way:  In my preparation to go to court, I saw many cases 
where I have every reason to believe that the defendant was not guilty.  To 
save trouble and to avoid setting any precedences, the verdict was guilty.
Call it Cheating , ugly, unfair, disgusting, corrupt or whatever you wish, 
the system remains theirs and IT STINKS.
  
I suggest as an act of courtesy that all motorists flash their head-lights for 
incoming traffic in case they see a radar trap.  This is of course if you have 
decided not to run the radar and its operator over!!!!!!!!!!!! (not suggested!)

If you need any help regarding your particular situation, please don't 
hesitate to E-Mail me.  I will be glad to see someone win over these.........
(fill the space accoring to your own vocabulary!)

Sincerely Your's

Hany