🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: aus.tv.community
Article #84

Re: TVS - Still the same

#84
From: 100246.2055
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:15
56 lines
3863 bytes
>Ok Genius, tell everybody here, WHAT programs you would run, where you
>would get them from (in 13 episode block supply, 2 weeks before going
>to air) and how much you would pay for them?

That's not my problem.
TVS told the ABA that they had a never-ending supply of good community
programming of excellent technical quality just waiting to be aired.
Pity about that!

>The quaility of programs is nots TVS' fault moron, they can only play
>what people send in..and the are showing the BEST of what slicetv sent
>them...if they did not run it as you suggest, there would be a lot of
>black going to air..and you'd like that wouldn't you so you can then
>probably criticize them for not having any programs.

Again where is all this wonderful programming that was promised?
OK it might be Slice TV that are not supplying good programming, but
they are an integral part of the license application and the facts are
that
if there are only "shitty" programmes to watch, as I have said before
the future looks bleak.

>So come on , fess up..you are from the old school applicants at
>"Gladesville TV" who didnt get the Ch31 license and are now looking for
>any opprotunity to bring them down...

As you are or should be aware Gladesville TV did not apply for the
license, and offered UWS (TVS) use of their professional facilities
to get the station on air immediately the license was awarded and the
offer was rejected by TVS.
It would have got the station up and running 18 months earlier at no
cost but the powers that be at TVS seemed to want to do things their
own way and not accept help from the community.


>and please enlighten us each and every show that had "rubbery" audio,
>whatever that means, as my use of adjectives does not entend to such
>technical detail?

You well know that the common term in the industry for audio that is
not
in sync with the video or is drifting in sync is "Rubbery"


>Do you also attack the commercial networks as well when they do a
>satellite cross and the audio is out by 1 sec...I see plenty of sync
>errors on all networks, who pay millions of dollars for digital playout
>systems, framestores, ARCS, de-embedders and transmission systems...why
>is it SO important to have each and every program on a low bidget CTV
>station in perfect sync ? Such anal retentivenss is bad for one's
>health I thinks. Try laxettes.


I fail to see how laxettes will help your out of sync problems, but try
it if
you think it will help.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1141787703.131355.58170@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1141723061.414101.301090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1141724563.817567.92030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1141733289.983369.160950@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1141746819.837692.104860@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f115,f5a4d70492ddb1cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f115,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: 100246.2055@compuserve.com
Newsgroups: aus.tv.community
Subject: Re: TVS - Still the same
Date: 7 Mar 2006 19:15:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <1141787703.131355.58170@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1141723061.414101.301090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <1141724563.817567.92030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <1141733289.983369.160950@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1141746819.837692.104860@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.140.74.132
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141787710 25078 127.0.0.1 (8 Mar 2006 03:15:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 03:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1141746819.837692.104860@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=144.140.74.132;
   posting-account=eZWlqAwAAAA3DSgVvmDlT0QTkeib7TdF