Article View: aus.tv.community
Article #86Re: TVS - Still the same
From: 100246.2055
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 07:08
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 07:08
25 lines
2413 bytes
2413 bytes
Well if Slice can't supply programmes who is going to? Slice don't have the licence, TVS does. It's TVS's responsibility for technical matters and in reality for programming as well. Or is it a case of TVS waiting for a "Sugar Daddy" like "Renaissance TV" to buy tons of airtime and turn it into a commercial venture? Community 31 has already failed several times and if TVS fails it opens the way for the ACMA to say "Well we gave it a good go and it can't work, so lets use the channel for a commercial station". Hello FOX-31? Within the ABA / ACMA regulations if TVS can find an organisation to do that it would be a goldmine for them but the worst thing for the community. By the way the ABA published their reasoning in awarding TVS the licence over the other applicants. You are obviously behind in your reading.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1141801700.997398.220940@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1141723061.414101.301090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1141724563.817567.92030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1141733289.983369.160950@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1141746819.837692.104860@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1141787703.131355.58170@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1141791826.149230.36870@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f115,f5a4d70492ddb1cd X-Google-Attributes: gid10f115,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: 100246.2055@compuserve.com Newsgroups: aus.tv.community Subject: Re: TVS - Still the same Date: 7 Mar 2006 23:08:21 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 26 Message-ID: <1141801700.997398.220940@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> References: <1141723061.414101.301090@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1141724563.817567.92030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1141733289.983369.160950@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1141746819.837692.104860@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> <1141787703.131355.58170@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1141791826.149230.36870@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.245.178.133 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141801706 24185 127.0.0.1 (8 Mar 2006 07:08:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:08:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1141791826.149230.36870@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 syd-nxg-pr3.tpgi.com.au:3128 (tpg-proxy/10) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=220.245.178.133; posting-account=eZWlqAwAAAA3DSgVvmDlT0QTkeib7TdF