Article View: aus.tv.digital
Article #665Re: Drongo goes Digital
From: DonH
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:36
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:36
66 lines
4152 bytes
4152 bytes
"atec77" <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jg52lq$66t$2@dont-email.me...
> On 30/01/2012 1:35 AM, DonH wrote:
>> "Brad"<google2@vk2qq.com> wrote in message
>> news:5711129.405.1327802783494.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlv30...
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:15:50 AM UTC+11, DonH wrote:
>>> I may decide to do without DTV-ABC, as all other reception is fine.
>>> This response, however, was received by email, earlier (from a
>>> professional):
>>>
>>> "Hi Don thanks for the enquiry, if your TV is receiving ABC on analogue
>>> and
>>> it is somewhat clear then there is no reason why digital shouldn't be
>>> getting it. It sounds like its an issue with the TV's Digital Tuner.
>>> Maybe
>>> call ******** # customer support to see if they have an answer for you."
>>>
>>> # (Brand name suppressed by me, here.)
>>
>>
>> That's just plain wrong. You cannot blindly state that the reception of
>> CH2
>> (for which the antenna is designed) should be equal to the reception of
>> CH12
>> (for which the antenna is probably not designed.)
>>
>> You need a new antenna. An antenna installer can do a survey for you.
>> They
>> can measure the strength of the ABC digital signal at the antenna cable
>> plug
>> and tell you if it is strong enough. They can also put a temporary
>> antenna
>> on the roof and let you see the improvement for yourself.
>>
>> # Alright, point taken.
>> Can you recommend a TV antenna expert in the Camberwell, Vic, area,
>> who
>> will give an assessment, at reasonable price?
>> As I said earlier, I can live without ABC, if necessary, but it does
>> seem
>> odd that it is the one channel or bandwidth which is unavailable, while
>> all
>> other DTV channels give excellent results.
>> Currently, I can receive ABC on analog, on this new TV set, but, come
>> Dec
>> 2013, it may be goodbye to anything ABC.
>> (Incidentally, Dick Smith Electronics markets a plug-in TV Amplifier,
>> for
>> about $30 - any use?)
>>
>>
> Just go check your local paper , spend the $120 odd and loosen the grip on
> your purse
> sop
>
> --
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
# Well, I relented and got in the TV specialist.
Yes, a new antenna fixed the problem.
So, that's my daughter set up with digital, at her home.
Now for me; firstly I still use the old ribbon lead from the wall plug,
not co-axial cable...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<N_zXq.2843$%E2.966@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni264053pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<KnXTq.2146$v14.563@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <foBUq.2490$%E2.1078@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <10128592.56.1327700651856.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq15> <m3WUq.2298$v14.726@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <5711129.405.1327802783494.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlv30> <8HdVq.2326$v14.544@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <jg52lq$66t$2@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112dd4,6806bb5d5b34c109
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd769b1b3b6,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.227.40 with SMTP id rx8mr9370133pbc.5.1328466990539;
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:36:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni264053pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!61.9.128.156.MISMATCH!viwinnwcl01.internal.bigpond.com!viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: "DonH" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com>
Newsgroups: aus.tv.digital
References: <KnXTq.2146$v14.563@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <foBUq.2490$%E2.1078@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <10128592.56.1327700651856.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq15> <m3WUq.2298$v14.726@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <5711129.405.1327802783494.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlv30> <8HdVq.2326$v14.544@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> <jg52lq$66t$2@dont-email.me>
Subject: Re: Drongo goes Digital
Lines: 68
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <N_zXq.2843$%E2.966@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 05:36:31 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.181.136.9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com 1328466989 124.181.136.9 (Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:36:29 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:36:29 EST
Organization: BigPond