Article View: aus.tv.digital
Article #683Re: Foxtel?
From: Derek
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:04
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:04
4 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
DonH wrote: > What is the advantage of installing Foxtel - apart from getting more > channels? You get a different set of adds.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4f34b392$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!wr5ni7602pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-02.inet.qwest.net!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<ixUYq.2860$v14.1421@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112dd4,bf5aaad1a226d08e
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd769b1b3b6,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr3029239pbv.7.1328854279508;
Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:04:48 +1000
From: Derek <derek@home>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: aus.tv.digital
Subject: Re: Foxtel?
References: <ixUYq.2860$v14.1421@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>
In-Reply-To: <ixUYq.2860$v14.1421@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.213.83.189
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.213.83.189
Message-ID: <4f34b392$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1328853906 203.213.83.189 (10 Feb 2012 17:05:06 +1100)
Lines: 4
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!wr5ni7602pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-02.inet.qwest.net!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit