🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by Marts Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:52
Seven/Prime and its Contempt for Sports Viewers
#747
Author: Marts
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:52
13 lines
1548 bytes
While listening to the news bulletin on the car radio I heard that the Clipsal
500 V8 race was on today.

So, when I got home I flicked on the box to see that Prime (a rural Seven
affiliate) was showing the V8s on its SD channel.

The blokey 7Mate wasn't showing it.

I find this quite extraordinary. Why have HD channels if they aren't going to
maximise the benefits for the viewers? The V8s is a premium product for the
Seven Network. So why waste it on SD?

And the picture quality is quite ordinary, too.
Re: Seven/Prime and its Contempt for Sports Viewers
#751
Author: Brad
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:58
16 lines
2026 bytes
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 3:52:25 PM UTC+11, Marts wrote:
> While listening to the news bulletin on the car radio I heard that the Clipsal
> 500 V8 race was on today.
> 
> So, when I got home I flicked on the box to see that Prime (a rural Seven
> affiliate) was showing the V8s on its SD channel.
> 
> The blokey 7Mate wasn't showing it.
> 
> I find this quite extraordinary. Why have HD channels if they aren't going to
> maximise the benefits for the viewers? The V8s is a premium product for the
> Seven Network. So why waste it on SD?
> 
> And the picture quality is quite ordinary, too.

Because with the bandwidth constraints of running 4 channels, HD is now unsuitable for fast motion sports.
Re: Seven/Prime and its Contempt for Sports Viewers
#752
Author: Marts
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:57
16 lines
1793 bytes
Brad wrote...

> > I find this quite extraordinary. Why have HD channels if they aren't going to
> > maximise the benefits for the viewers? The V8s is a premium product for the
> > Seven Network. So why waste it on SD?
> > 
> > And the picture quality is quite ordinary, too.
> 
> Because with the bandwidth constraints of running 4 channels, HD is now unsuitable for fast motion sports.

Four channels? We see 3 (Prime, Mate and 7 Two).

What are these constraints anyway, and why do they limit HD?

Certainly, OneHD (or One Gippsland as I know it) has no problems when watching
the F1. Hopefully MotoGP will be a lot better than last year.
Re: Seven/Prime and its Contempt for Sports Viewers
#753
Author: Brad
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:50
19 lines
2212 bytes
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:57:14 AM UTC+11, Marts wrote:
> Brad wrote...
> 
> > > I find this quite extraordinary. Why have HD channels if they aren't going to
> > > maximise the benefits for the viewers? The V8s is a premium product for the
> > > Seven Network. So why waste it on SD?
> > > 
> > > And the picture quality is quite ordinary, too.
> > 
> > Because with the bandwidth constraints of running 4 channels, HD is now unsuitable for fast motion sports.
> 
> Four channels? We see 3 (Prime, Mate and 7 Two).
> 
> What are these constraints anyway, and why do they limit HD?
> 
> Certainly, OneHD (or One Gippsland as I know it) has no problems when watching
> the F1. Hopefully MotoGP will be a lot better than last year.

Prime, Mate, 7Two and 4Me.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads