Article View: austin.eff
Article #231Re: Online petitioning
From: Stanton McCandlish
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00
53 lines
2809 bytes
2809 bytes
> Howdy! I'm with a local grass-roots organization and we're interested in > the possibility of putting our petition on-line through the Web. What we > would like your opinion on is how this could be done, Set up an infobot that will collect responses. Instuct folks to send a message like so: I <name> support/oppose whatever <address> <email address> <phone> Have the infobot sort this stuff, discard junk entries (notifying the sender something went wrong, quoting their message back to them and informing them of the proper syntax. Should weed out duplicates. Also, set up a HTML form on a www page to collect this info. Have the form reject incomplete entries (I don't know which if either of phone or address are needed; you'll need to check on that.) > and the legal > questions behind verification of names. I've had alot of experience with As far as I know there are no legalities involved, but I'm not a lawyer. > the Internet, and putting a Web-form on line to be filled out by surfers > would be no problem, but we're just wondering how the City of Austin would > view these names without signatures--i.e. the verification problem. This > raises alot of issues, some of them legal, As before, I'm not aware of any legal issues here. We've had zero trouble conducting petitions of this sort. But we did ask for either address, phone, or both (I forget). > and we'd like your opinion on > this. Thanks in advance for your help. I'd like to talk to someone voice > about this if possible, so if you could leave me some email with a voice > number I'll give you a call. Not sure who to refer you to. Anyway, in general, I'd strongly recommend only doing a petition as an adjunct to a letter-writing, calling, emailing and faxing campaign. Even real petitions aren't particularly effective by themselves. As for authentication, have people that can/will do it PGP sign their entries. -- <A HREF="http://www.eff.org/~mech/"> Stanton McCandlish </A><HR><A HREF="mailto:mech@eff.org"> mech@eff.org </A><P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/"> Electronic Frontier Foundation </A><P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/1.html"> Online Services Mgr. </A>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199508032145.RAA24167@eff.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<v01510100ac4540492ac8@[198.252.182.69]>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 126c00,922f197713a0fd44 X-Google-Attributes: gid126c00,public From: mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish) Subject: Re: Online petitioning Date: 1995/08/04 Message-ID: <199508032145.RAA24167@eff.org> X-Deja-AN: 107587615 approved: eff-austin-moderator sender: daemon@zilker.net x-unparseable-date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 17:45:09 -0400 (EDT) references: <v01510100ac4540492ac8@[198.252.182.69]> organization: Zilker Internet Park, Inc. reply-to: eff-austin@zilker.net newsgroups: austin.eff