Article View: austin.eff
Article #321(fwd) Internet Censors Close to Success: Act Now
From: David Smith
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00
100 lines
5564 bytes
5564 bytes
> > >Internet Censors Close to Success: Act Now > >By Howard Rheingold >syndicated by King Features >electronic rights: Howard Rheingold >Permission granted to redistribute this column (Internet Censors Close to >Success) freely. > >The religious right is only weeks away from final victory in its battle to >shut American citizens out of the Internet as a medium for uncensored >communication. > >The story so far: The censorship drive began in February, 1995, with the >introduction of S.314, "The Computer Decency Act of 1995" (CDA), by Senator >Jim Exon (D-NE), as part of the much larger telecommunications deregulation >bill, S 652. Senator Leahy (D-VT) countered CDA with "The Family >Empowerment Act," which mandates investigation of technical means for >parents to determine what comes into their homes and schools for their >children to see, according to their own family's values. CDA passed the >Senate on June 14; Leahy's amendment lost. On June 21, opposition to the >Exon amendment was voiced even among prominent Republicans, including >Representative Gingrich (R-GA). > >Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA), and Rep. Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the "Internet >Freedom and Family Empowerment Act" (HR 1978), offering an approach that >would empower parents, rather than the State, to make decisions abot what >is considered decent in every household. > >The time has come for Congress to choose between competing amendments. >Whether our representatives ultimately go down the road to censorship >advocated by the Exon amendment, or choose the parental empowerment >approach advocated by the Cox-Wyden amendment, depends on the outcome of >the battle for public opinion. In the final weeks of 1995, the campaigns >for and against the CDA are approaching the decisive moment. Unless many >people who favor freedom of expression make telephone calls, write letters, >send faxes, right now, as the pro-censorship forces certainly are doing, >the censors are going to win. > >An extremist minority is pressing for final legislation that is even more >restrictive than the Exon bill. This faction, now openly led by the >religious right, seeks to use criminal and civil penalties to hold all >Americans' online conversations, web pages, public archives to a rigidly >defined standard for decency of content. The bill's zealous backers make it >clear that their interpretation of decency in the new medium is far more >strict than those standards upheld by the Supreme Court in regard to other >forms of speech. > >Discourse on the Net will be restricted to that which is judged suitable >for young children in strict households. The liability issues, if upheld, >will mean the death of the online services industry, which has been growing >explosively. America will hand off yet another native industry to global >competitors. Until and unless the Supreme Court decides thatthe legislation >is unconstitutional, the decency cops, with the full power of the law, will >have their day. > >In October, 1995, Commerce committee chairman Larry Pressler received a >letter signed by The Christian Coalition's Ralph Reed, Eagle Forum's >Phyllis Schafly, the Reverends Donald Wildmon and Louis Sheldon of the >American Family Association and Traditional Values Coalition, and former >Attorney General Edwin Meese, that threw the weight of the top >organizations of the religious right behind legislation that would >establish a Federal decency police and shut down the emerging online >communications industry by making online service providers criminally >liable for the activities of their customers. The battle of the CDA is part >of the sweeping telecommunications deregulation bill (S 652), now >approaching the final stages of Congressional decision-making. > >Call or fax Newt Gingrich's office now (1-202-225-4501 voice; >1-202-225-4656 fax), and cc Senator Robert Dole (R-KS) (1-202-224-6521 >voice; 1-202-228-1245 fax).Tell them you favor the parental control tools >proposed in the Cox-White-Wyden amendment to the chilling and unnecessary >Exon amendment. Tell them that you, not the the Federal government, are the >proper authority to decide what is decent in your household. > >For more information, check web sites http://www.vtw.org/exon/ and >URL:http://www.cdt.org/cda.html . Gopher archives: >gopher://gopher.eff.org/11/Alerts. Via e-mail, send a message to >vtw@vtw.org (put "send alert" in the subject line for the latest alert, or >"send cdafaq" for the CDA FAQ). > >Stay informed, spread the word, make those calls. > >END > >Howard Rheingold hlr@well.com >http://www.wll.com/user/hlr/ >Fax: 415 388 3913 >what it is ----->is------>up to us > David Smith * "We truly believe that even though we live in an evil bladex@bga.com * world, if you can stand up with a stronger will, then you President, EFF-Austin * can't be beaten down. This is the true spirit of the Board of Directors, CTCLU * EFF-Austin member" -- John Woo
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199511290210.UAA09093@zoom.bga.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 126c00,74003faab4baf6f3,start X-Google-Attributes: gid126c00,public From: bladex@bga.com (David Smith) Subject: (fwd) Internet Censors Close to Success: Act Now Date: 1995/11/29 Message-ID: <199511290210.UAA09093@zoom.bga.com> X-Deja-AN: 120380944 sender: daemon@zilker.net x-unparseable-date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:08:49 -0600 organization: Zilker Internet Park, Inc. reply-to: eff-austin@zilker.net newsgroups: austin.eff