🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan23.233254.881@tic.com> bazooka@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Bob Anderson) writes:
>Sorry it took so long for me to respond to both Jon and John, but
>duties call and I wanted to give others a chance to jump into
>the discussion anyway.

No problem.  I just got back from California, and wasn't reading
news a lot while I was there, either.

>SJG bust was one of the most ignorant raids and not the best of 
>examples. Many of us are no doubt being monitored and the letter 
>of the law is often transgressed on many if not all local BBSs.  
>I am not a business.  I have a personal bbs set up to serve artists 
>and others that very often do not give a hairy fig for rules & regs. 
>My choices seem to be keep it up and risk castration or jackoff in
>private.  So far I am staying the course and exposing myself 
>publically.  <only semi sarcastic> 

Hope you found the EFF-Austin sysop workshop today useful,
what with the assembled lawyers, who represented a large
fraction of all the relevant legal expertise in this country.
Ed Cavazos gets the green hat on this one.

I suspect the recent developments in the SJG case may help lots of people....
EFF did good on that one, I think.

>Thank you both for responding to my thots.  I would still like to hear
>from the rest of the BOD and BOA more often within this news group.

I think the directors and advisors are in agreement that more posting is good.

>  If
>service in the machinery of the organization keeps y'all away from this
>important voice to the local BBS communitity, then you have given me 
>another reason to avoid volunteering beyond my means.

Looks to me like you have found your volunteer niche, nudging us through
this newsgroup.  Prentiss can do that to some extent, but not too much,
without losing his moderatorial objectivity.  You can say what you please.
Please do.

Thanks,
John