Thread View: austin.important
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Steve Bromberg
Fri, 19 Feb 1993 01:22
Why is this group called aus.important?
Author: Steve Bromberg
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 01:22
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 01:22
3 lines
705 bytes
705 bytes
. . . [A]nd is there life beyond Steve Jackson? What was that digital ritual for quittting a newsgroup?
let's recruit a moderator (Re: Why is this group called aus.important?)
Author: Werner Uhrig
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 12:11
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 12:11
16 lines
1381 bytes
1381 bytes
In Steve@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Steve Bromberg) writes:
>. . . [A]nd is there life beyond Steve Jackson?
>What was that digital ritual for quittting a newsgroup?
barf right into the middle of it?!? :-)
I've caught myself wishing for the group to become moderated;
ANYONE (even the brain-dead posters we have seen lately) is
likely to have an improving effect ...
the alternative is to send critical email notes to posters,
but that is like fighting mosquitos with a water pistol...
--
werner@cs.utexas.edu | ..!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!werner | werner@UTXVM.bitnet
"Free Advice and Opinions -- Refunds Available"
Re: let's recruit a moderator (Re: Why is this group called aus.important?)
Author: Chip Rosenthal
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 21:08
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1993 21:08
38 lines
2703 bytes
2703 bytes
[followups are redirected] In article <lo9jiuINN1kj@dimebox.cs.utexas.edu> werner@cs.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig) writes: > I've caught myself wishing for the group to become moderated; A little bit of history for the folks just tuning in. About two years back we tried to create a newsgroup called `austin.announce' to be a low-volume, high-interest newsgroup for messages that get lost amidst the traffic in austin.general. The problem is that some older news implementations treat the name `announce' as a magic cookie, and insist that a newsgroup with it in the name must be moderated. This turned into such a hassle that we decided to try again, but with the name `austin.important'. `Austin.important' has been a flop. I can tell you through personal experience at least one reason why. As the keeper and poster of the CACTUS newsletter, I feel the monthly message is an announcement of general interest, and belongs in such a special newsgroup. But then I look at the name `important', and gawsh that's awful intimidating. Yes, there is very broad interest in the CACTUS newsletter and it probably belongs in a special announcements group. But `important'? I dunno. It's not like the world will end if you don't see this month's newsletter. The name `austin.important' stinks. `Austin.announce' is much more meaningful and reasonable, but history has shown it is workable only if it is moderated. (Yeah...the number of crufty, old B-news installs is declining, but it ain't dead yet.) If we are going to do anything, I'd advocate resurrecting `austin.announce' as a moderated group and killing off `austin.important'. And, yes, I'll volunteer if somebody is needed. -- Chip Rosenthal 512-482-8260 | Now I only use my gun whenever kindness Unicom Systems Development | fails. - Robert Earl Keen, Jr. <chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM> |
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads