🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: austin.internet
Article #103

Re: Paging Dusty Rhodes

#103
From: Cass
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 05:37
115 lines
5098 bytes
Dusty,

Grow up.  You fool no one except yourself.

You are really slipping mentally.

Cass


"Dusty Rhodes" <terra@POTTEDMEATtexas.net> wrote in message
news:pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
> "Z" <_fireblaze_@yahoo.comNOSPAM> wrote in message
> news:sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
> > Dusty,
> >
> >
> > I just had a nice chat with APD. the time is 10:10pm. this is to inform
> you
> > ONCE AGAIN that i have you killfiled. Attempts to get around my killfile
> > from hereon are considered harassment (getting people to respond to your
> > post with the intent of it bieng viewed by me is also harassment).
>
> You stupid loon, this is a public forum. Post here and you're inviting a
> response. ANYONE can respond to you for ANY reason, just because you
posted
> here. Sheesh.
>
> I can only imagine the amusement his "friend" at APD gets from each of his
> calls.
>
> > APD has
> > informed me (they have your name now) to contact them again IF YOU
ATTEMPT
> > TO MAKE CONTACT WITH ME AGAIN. they also said that anyone calling you a
> > child molestor is freedom of speech. there was no crime commited.
>
> No "crime" there, but you *are* guilty of libel, a *civil* offense for
which
> you can have your ass sued off. Particularly if you are stupid enough to
do
> it in a professional forum of peers, as you have done. Ask your good
friend
> the attorney.
>
> > THIS IS
> > QUOTED FROM  THE AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT. APD also stated that the most
> you
> > could do to me would be something like 'cursing you out' wich is a class
C
> > Misdemeanor. But, since you know none of my info, i dont seriously think
> you
> > could serve papers of any sort on me. RR is going to want a subpoena,
wich
> > you would ask your lawyer for, who would ask APD for, who have stated
that
> > no crime was commited. looks like you ran into a dead end. once again,
ANY
> > posts that are an obvious/insinuated(to be determined by me) attempt to
> get
> > my attention WILL be considered harassment by the APD, and i will press
> > charges. DO NOT CONTACT ME FURTHER IN ANY MEANS JOHN.
>
> As long as you're quoting APD, what, exactly, was the report number? You
> *did* file a report, right?
>
> I actually *did* just speak to APD. I filed a report, too. They'll be
> watching for you.
>
> See, genius, you made a physical threat in a public forum and guess what?
> That, according to APD, is assault, at the very least. They'll arrest you
on
> sight.
>
> Now, go search Google, see I'm right and shit big cold bricks. I sign that
> complaint that they're being nice enough to bring by to me at the NNO and
> you go to jail.
>
> As to RR, apparently you're a pimple on their ass. They're *thrilled* to
> have solid cause to TOSs your ass. Just watch.
>
> And they'll be more than happy to turn over *all* of your logs, once I
serve
> them with the subpoena granted in accordance with the Pro Se case I've
> already filed. You made it *way* too easy.
>
> But I don't really have to worry about that, anymore. APD is more than
happy
> to track you down for me. If I sign the complaint. See you at the NNO,
will
> we?
>
> I was going to leave all of this with a simple apology. But no, that's not
> good enough for you. You want the *full* treatment. Well, I aim to please.
> Enjoy.
>
> I have irrefutable proof of libel in a public forum and *HUNDREDS* of
> witnesses champing at the bit to testify against you. I have irrefutable
> proof of you making physical threats. So does anyone else with Google
> access.
>
> You're screwed, pal. I'd have settled for your apology, but you've chosen
> another route As I told you before, child, you have some very interesting
> life lessons in your immediate future.
>
> Oh, and under no circumstances should *anyone* answer this post 'cause Z
> says APD will arrest you for harassment. <giggle> Don't let the fact that
he
> *claims* he won't see it otherwise even enter into the decision making
> process.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dusty
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <a61lio$n53$0@pita.alt.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.alt.net!usenet
References: <sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com> <pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f99ed,683cc7d4ed3babec
X-Google-Attributes: gidf99ed,public
X-Google-Thread: 113866,990a1658f6dce8cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,683cc7d4ed3babec
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-04 21:37:29 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.alt.net!usenet
From: "Cass" <cassegrainian@galaxycorp.com>
Newsgroups: austin.internet,austin.general,austin.food
Subject: Re: Paging Dusty Rhodes
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 23:37:29 -0600
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - http://www.altopia.com
Lines: 117
Message-ID: <a61lio$n53$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com> <pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000