Article View: austin.internet
Article #103Re: Paging Dusty Rhodes
From: Cass
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 05:37
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 05:37
115 lines
5098 bytes
5098 bytes
Dusty, Grow up. You fool no one except yourself. You are really slipping mentally. Cass "Dusty Rhodes" <terra@POTTEDMEATtexas.net> wrote in message news:pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com... > "Z" <_fireblaze_@yahoo.comNOSPAM> wrote in message > news:sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com... > > Dusty, > > > > > > I just had a nice chat with APD. the time is 10:10pm. this is to inform > you > > ONCE AGAIN that i have you killfiled. Attempts to get around my killfile > > from hereon are considered harassment (getting people to respond to your > > post with the intent of it bieng viewed by me is also harassment). > > You stupid loon, this is a public forum. Post here and you're inviting a > response. ANYONE can respond to you for ANY reason, just because you posted > here. Sheesh. > > I can only imagine the amusement his "friend" at APD gets from each of his > calls. > > > APD has > > informed me (they have your name now) to contact them again IF YOU ATTEMPT > > TO MAKE CONTACT WITH ME AGAIN. they also said that anyone calling you a > > child molestor is freedom of speech. there was no crime commited. > > No "crime" there, but you *are* guilty of libel, a *civil* offense for which > you can have your ass sued off. Particularly if you are stupid enough to do > it in a professional forum of peers, as you have done. Ask your good friend > the attorney. > > > THIS IS > > QUOTED FROM THE AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT. APD also stated that the most > you > > could do to me would be something like 'cursing you out' wich is a class C > > Misdemeanor. But, since you know none of my info, i dont seriously think > you > > could serve papers of any sort on me. RR is going to want a subpoena, wich > > you would ask your lawyer for, who would ask APD for, who have stated that > > no crime was commited. looks like you ran into a dead end. once again, ANY > > posts that are an obvious/insinuated(to be determined by me) attempt to > get > > my attention WILL be considered harassment by the APD, and i will press > > charges. DO NOT CONTACT ME FURTHER IN ANY MEANS JOHN. > > As long as you're quoting APD, what, exactly, was the report number? You > *did* file a report, right? > > I actually *did* just speak to APD. I filed a report, too. They'll be > watching for you. > > See, genius, you made a physical threat in a public forum and guess what? > That, according to APD, is assault, at the very least. They'll arrest you on > sight. > > Now, go search Google, see I'm right and shit big cold bricks. I sign that > complaint that they're being nice enough to bring by to me at the NNO and > you go to jail. > > As to RR, apparently you're a pimple on their ass. They're *thrilled* to > have solid cause to TOSs your ass. Just watch. > > And they'll be more than happy to turn over *all* of your logs, once I serve > them with the subpoena granted in accordance with the Pro Se case I've > already filed. You made it *way* too easy. > > But I don't really have to worry about that, anymore. APD is more than happy > to track you down for me. If I sign the complaint. See you at the NNO, will > we? > > I was going to leave all of this with a simple apology. But no, that's not > good enough for you. You want the *full* treatment. Well, I aim to please. > Enjoy. > > I have irrefutable proof of libel in a public forum and *HUNDREDS* of > witnesses champing at the bit to testify against you. I have irrefutable > proof of you making physical threats. So does anyone else with Google > access. > > You're screwed, pal. I'd have settled for your apology, but you've chosen > another route As I told you before, child, you have some very interesting > life lessons in your immediate future. > > Oh, and under no circumstances should *anyone* answer this post 'cause Z > says APD will arrest you for harassment. <giggle> Don't let the fact that he > *claims* he won't see it otherwise even enter into the decision making > process. > > Cheers, > > Dusty > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a61lio$n53$0@pita.alt.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.alt.net!usenetReferences:
<sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com> <pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f99ed,683cc7d4ed3babec X-Google-Attributes: gidf99ed,public X-Google-Thread: 113866,990a1658f6dce8cd X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,public X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,683cc7d4ed3babec X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-04 21:37:29 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.alt.net!usenet From: "Cass" <cassegrainian@galaxycorp.com> Newsgroups: austin.internet,austin.general,austin.food Subject: Re: Paging Dusty Rhodes Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 23:37:29 -0600 Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - http://www.altopia.com Lines: 117 Message-ID: <a61lio$n53$0@pita.alt.net> References: <sCXg8.51600$6j2.2958065@typhoon.austin.rr.com> <pcYg8.55419$dj3.1853277@typhoon.austin.rr.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000