Article View: austin.internet
Article #183load balancer
From: the wharf rat
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:48
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:48
9 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
What's everbody's favorite load balancer? I like the F5 bigip stuff but it might be out of my budget not to mention overkill. The context is a startup project (not a startup *company* :-) involving 2-4 web application servers that need to be clustered/load balancedfor failover and future scalability. Traffic will be moderate even in the beginning due to some large files being moved around but the trasaction load will be light. Suggestions? How's that coyote point stuff work out?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<g2uitp$a1$1@panix2.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 113866,4d85015688e557b3,start X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) Newsgroups: austin.internet Subject: load balancer Date: 13 Jun 2008 15:48:09 -0400 Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp. Lines: 11 Message-ID: <g2uitp$a1$1@panix2.panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1213386488 3243 166.84.1.2 (13 Jun 2008 19:48:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:48:08 +0000 (UTC)