Article View: austin.internet
Article #280ok, why the heck...
From: the wharf rat
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:01
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:01
4 lines
843 bytes
843 bytes
Ok, WHY don't Redhat/Centos include ntfs support in the production kernel?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<g0or8s$ppt$1@panix2.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 113866,6885e16e8d41d2d7,start X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) Newsgroups: austin.internet Subject: ok, why the heck... Date: 18 May 2008 05:01:16 -0400 Organization: PANIX -- Public Access Networks Corp. Lines: 5 Message-ID: <g0or8s$ppt$1@panix2.panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1211101276 14923 166.84.1.2 (18 May 2008 09:01:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:01:16 +0000 (UTC)