Article View: austin.internet
Article #28819Re: City of Austin "Universal Access Project"
From: Gary Chapman
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:00
79 lines
4863 bytes
4863 bytes
I've had some interaction with Austin Free-Net and Sue Beckwith, so I think I can clear up some misunderstandings about the whole thing. Sue's salary is the only money that the City of Austin is dedicating to the Austin Free-Net. She has been detailed to help create a nonprofit that is meant to serve under-served people and communities in Austin, and to create public access terminals to the Internet in libraries and other public facilities. (By the way, Sue is not a librarian -- she's a systems developer who has previously worked in the environmental office of the City.) It is the assumption of Austin Free-Net that it will depend on volunteers and donated equipment, as well as contributions amd grants, to get its program up and running. Sue, Lodis Rhodes of the LBJ School at UT, and I collaborated last spring on writing a large grant proposal that was submitted to the Telecommunications Information Infrastructure Assistance Program, of the federal Department of Commerce. Our grant proposal asked for money to support equipment purchases and modest staff compensation, but reliance on volunteers was built into the proposal too. We're waiting to hear about this grant; the announcements are scheduled for late October, but may be delayed because of some initiatives in Congress to cut the funding for this program. In the meantime, Sue has been working with staff of the Family Learning Centers of the Austin Housing Authority to get them using the Internet and the World-Wide Web. Residents of Austin public housing have been taking classes on the Web at Go Media, an Austin graphics and P.R. firm (which did the City's Web page) where Austin Free-Net has donated office space. David's description of Free-Net's intentions was correct -- this is meant to serve people who would otherwise not use the Internet, primarily because they can't afford to buy a computer. It is an attempt to build some computer presence in low-income neighborhoods in Austin, similar to what other communities are doing -- there are Free-Nets in about 75 cities and rural areas in the U.S. (see the list at the URL: http://www.nptn.org:80/about.fn/By_State.txt.html) and an increasing number of cities have "community computing centers." In fact, when I moved to Austin last year, I was somewhat surprised that Austin didn't have something similar; fortunately, Austin Free-Net is trying to do something about this (as is MAIN, although MAIN is more content-oriented than access-oriented, so far). I'd say that the City's modest investment -- which really only amounts to redirecting Sue Beckwith's time for a year -- is laudable. I also agree with Mike Byrnes that there is some potential friction between Austin Free-Net and the independent ISPs in Austin. I've tried to raise this issue at a series of meetings on public access issues in Austin -- meetings attended by Gene Crick and organized by Sue -- but so far we haven't gotten very far in addressing this problem -- or, for now, potential problem. I'm trying to organize a series of workshops at the LBJ School on policy issues related to public access to the Internet and to sources of public information, and one of the sessions I'm proposing is a discussion of the boundary between public systems and private systems. I don't think this is clearly understood, even by the national advocates of Free-Nets. Ideally, we should have some kind of task force investigating this issue for the City, for the public. We want to support the start-ups in the independent ISP business; on the other hand, we need to deal with the "market failures" of people who won't be regular net users because they can't afford it. This is related to the concept of "universal service" that the telephone companies have been obligated to observe, because of regulation, and which is now under attack. The policy question, and it's an important one, is how to foster both market-based telecom services without abandoning "universal service." No one, at this point, has offered a last-word solution to this. -- Gary Gary Chapman Coordinator The 21st Century Project LBJ School of Public Affairs Drawer Y, University Station University of Texas Austin, TX 78713 (512) 471-8326 (512) 471-1835 (fax) Electronic mail: gary.chapman@mail.utexas.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gary.chapman-2509951225580001@21cp.lbj.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<mbyrnes-1609950833190001@204.29.207.154>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 113866,3e3d3fc24db5cde6 X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,public From: gary.chapman@mail.utexas.edu (Gary Chapman) Subject: Re: City of Austin "Universal Access Project" Date: 1995/09/25 Message-ID: <gary.chapman-2509951225580001@21cp.lbj.utexas.edu> X-Deja-AN: 110753568 distribution: austin references: <mbyrnes-1609950833190001@204.29.207.154> organization: The 21st Century Project, University of Texas newsgroups: austin.internet