Article View: austin.internet
Article #28846Re: baud rate question
From: Jim McCoy
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1995 00:00
21 lines
1453 bytes
1453 bytes
Chip Rosenthal (chip@unicom.com) wrote: > In article <42qk8c$a8n@anarchy.io.com>, Jim McCoy <mccoy@io.com> wrote: > >Well, sort of. The current phone system samples signals at a rate of 8 KHz, > >and so there is a finite limit on how much information can be sent over > >a signal such as this > Actually, it's not even "sort of". It's just plain wrong. A > conventional analog phone line has a bandwidth of about 3000Hz. The > 8KHz has to do with the sampling rate required to represent this analog > signal as a digital one. Sigh. Next time I will be sure to do less hand-waving over niggling details and explain everything in more detail than anyone could ever want :) [Actually I suppose this is the closest there is to a local technogeek newsgroup so my gross simplification was probably unnecessary...] Then again, we should all probably just be glad that no one has taken up the endless Usenet "baud v. bps" telecom thread given the subject line. jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<42s3pr$1qn@anarchy.io.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<42pkam$7oj@Sierra.onr.com> <42pn4e$hgq@hello-nurse.cs.utexas.edu> <42qk8c$a8n@anarchy.io.com> <DEM4ED.E7s@unicom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 113866,3149597f192b137b X-Google-Attributes: gid113866,public From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy) Subject: Re: baud rate question Date: 1995/09/09 Message-ID: <42s3pr$1qn@anarchy.io.com> X-Deja-AN: 109814372 references: <42pkam$7oj@Sierra.onr.com> <42pn4e$hgq@hello-nurse.cs.utexas.edu> <42qk8c$a8n@anarchy.io.com> <DEM4ED.E7s@unicom.com> organization: Illuminati Online newsgroups: austin.internet