🚀 go-pugleaf

Wankatoa wrote:
> Ryan Hatfield <rydan@austin.rr.com> scribblednews:4799B0F7.1090506
> @austin.rr.com:
> 
>> Wankatoa wrote:
>>> Cool Whip <cw@cluemail.compost>
>>> scribblednews:d6b3cybqs46o$.dlg@sqwertz.com: 
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:41:31 -0000, Wankatoa wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a junk mail reporting program, but I have always wondered.
>>>> Now there's a big waste of time, energy and network resources.
>>>>
>>>>> It seems on some of them, when I try to report them the next week I 
> get
>>>>> 20 more emails from the same people.  I'm thinking that I'm simply
>>>>> verifying my valid email address by trying to forward it.
>>>> Duh.  You're an idiot for prancing around like some sort of
>>>> NetCop with your "Reported to ISP" posts.  It's no surprise you
>>>> also do it with email.  What a fool.
>>>>
>>>> -cw
>>>>
>>> If you're an ignorant fool, why shout it out loud for everyone to see?
>>>
>> Because it is hard to talk one on one with someone who is anonymous?
>>
> 
> So, if someone anoymously sent you 1 million dollars, you'd reject it?
> Anoymous is bad.
> Right.
> Privacy is bad..."if you're not doing anything bad, you shouldn't mind a 
> big 2 way camera in your bedroom, GPS on your cell phone and car and a 
> remote 2 monitoring device on your tv....oh yah, right.  Forgot.  All those 
> you have, except one, yet.
> Bet you can't guess which one!
> 

I don't have mirrors in my bedroom and I'd check them if I did.
iPhones don't have GPS.  This is a well known limitation of them.
I don't have a car.
It isn't a TV as it is actually a large flat panel computer monitor. 
And what could it possibly "monitor"?  Maybe the DVR tracks stuff but I 
think it would say more about Time Warner than me.

The kind of tracking you are talking about isn't even close to practical 
unless done on a very small scale.  Plus with your claim that 65% of all 
taxes goes to the police and firemen how could anyone afford it?

> 
> Hence, no adversarial mental combat, no toughing, nothing.  
> I give you, you.
> 

Do you even understand what I was talking about?  In order for him to 
talk to you he has to in a public setting because you don't publish your 
email.  It wasn't even ambiguous.