🚀 go-pugleaf

Don't know how I missed this one, but since he addressed it to me, WTH?

Rs wrote:
> 
> Dusty or whomever:

Dusty will do.
 
> Just as I thought, when I presented you with a way that you could find out
> what actually happened, you weren't interested.

No, we all asked you to give us the easily verifiable evidence. You have
refused. It is you who has shown no interest in the truth. The rest of
us are waiting with baited breath.

You have made your accusations publicly. Post your evidence publicly or
slink back to your hole. I am not interested in a private explanation.
I'd only post it anyway, so what's the point?

> Call me all the names that you wish.

Thanks, I will. Actually, I've only suggested you may be a liar or a
fool or both. I have yet to brand you with a name of your own. You have
the ultimate say so. I leave it up to the reader.

> Continue to think that because I don't choose (AT THIS TIME) to post the email/letter
> of which you DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT, that said email does not exist.

Of course it exists. You've just chosen not to post it, for some unknown
reason. Maybe it's just that you're smarter than everyone else here. Ya
think?

> I am not on a vendetta.

"I am not a crook." "I am not in denial." "The check is in the mail."  I
won't c*m in your mouth." "I am following a carefully laid out, very
clever plan of which you know nothing." Yeah, right.

> Why are you so interested in this.  Is it that perhaps you are not who you say
> you are?

Heh. I'm pretty well known around here. Ask around.

Of course, if you knew how to ping me, you'd already know I'm not
hiding. But I am impressed with your seemingly inexhaustible ability to
demonstrate your 'Net naivet�.

I told you before, I have no patience for those who seek to destroy
others based solely on their own ignorance. I will only answer posts
from you that unfairly impinge on the reputations of others. So far,
that's most of your posts.
 
> Don't pester me further.

Sorry, pal, post in a public forum and you have to put up with the
public response.

Keep posting your ridiculous crap in that, "I could trim my column
length, and I could trim my posts. I just choose not to," style of yours
and I will merrily point it out. Raise one valid point and I'll be the
first to acknowledge it.

BTW, I'm guessing you're the best thing that's happened to Texas.Net
since Chris Edmunson. I know you probably don't know how to search
archives, but check out http://www.dejanews.com. It's pretty simple and
it's all there. Jonah couldn't buy the kind of PR you're providing.

<snip of yet another quote from this guy of the entire post to which he
was responding, with  sig files, no less>

Cheers,

Dusty
-- 
ICQ 3636450

To reply by e mail, remove NOSPAM from return address.

"Champagne for my real friends and real pain for my sham friends."
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."
 - Tom Waits