Thread View: austin.news
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Stray Cat
Sat, 17 May 2003 13:00
Bush - Playing with Death - Bring On Regime Change
Author: Stray Cat
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:00
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:00
35 lines
3088 bytes
3088 bytes
It is a well-known and widely accepted fact that, during wartime, news companies and governmental representatives fuse their voices together into one univocal beam of support for the national military objective. But imagine a mediascape in which politicians actually said what they meant . One where the talking heads on broadcast news actually challenged the powerful interests in Washington not with fangless sensationalism, but with insightful deconstructions of true power and its manipulations. Here's a glimpse of what we would be hearing and reading today: Body Bag Bush is the second person to serve as president that was never elected, and like the first, his election ambitons must be destroyed. (Gerry Ford was the first.) Body Bag Bush campaigned on "smaller government" premises, has created the biggest government ever here in the USA. Everyday that Body Bag Bush is in the White House, we surf one day closer to the Apocalypse. Body Bag Bush is using the so-called War on Terrorism and its burgeoning McCarthyistic clampdown on open displays of dissent, and if allowed to continue in the White House will clampdown and invade the private lives of all citizens. The real reasons for the invasion of Iraq was to exact revenge for his father's shame (of losing the first Gulf war) and distracting from the screwed up state of the US Economy. Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are the real powers in Washington. Body Bag is "Dubya on a string." Texan Democrats ignited the fire that will lead to regime change in 2004. Yeah baby, bring it on!
Re: Bush - Playing with Death - Bring On Regime Change
Author: JerryMouse
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 03:42
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 03:42
84 lines
5469 bytes
5469 bytes
"Stray Cat" <meow@nospam.com> wrote in message news:Fnqxa.14403$vk3.986163@twister.austin.rr.com... > > It is a well-known and widely accepted fact that, during wartime, news > companies and governmental representatives fuse their voices together into > one univocal beam of support for the national military objective. > > But imagine a mediascape in which politicians actually said what they meant > . One where the talking heads on broadcast news actually challenged the > powerful interests in Washington not with fangless sensationalism, but with > insightful deconstructions of true power and its manipulations. Here's a > glimpse of what we would be hearing and reading today: > > Body Bag Bush is the second person to serve as president that was never > elected, and like the first, his election ambitons must be destroyed. > (Gerry Ford was the first.) > > Body Bag Bush campaigned on "smaller government" premises, has created the > biggest government ever here in the USA. > > Everyday that Body Bag Bush is in the White House, we surf one day closer to > the Apocalypse. > > Body Bag Bush is using the so-called War on Terrorism and its burgeoning > McCarthyistic clampdown on open displays of dissent, and if allowed to > continue in the White House will clampdown and invade the private lives of > all citizens. > > The real reasons for the invasion of Iraq was to exact revenge for his > father's shame (of losing the first Gulf war) and distracting from the > screwed up state of the US Economy. > > Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are the real powers in Washington. Body Bag is > "Dubya on a string." Whatever it is, it works for me. I'm happy. > > Texan Democrats ignited the fire that will lead to regime change in 2004. > Yeah baby, bring it on! You think? I certainly hope not. In 2002, the GOP had to win 60% of the Senate races to break even. They won 70% and picked up 4 seats. In 2004, the GOP has to win only 40% of the races to break even. If they win at 70% again, they'll pick up twelve seats in the U.S. Senate. The House is firmly GOP, but the GOP may pick up 10-12 seats (five from Texas if a special session is called on redistricting). For the Democrats, a left-wing candidate will win the Democratic primary. Probably not Dean or Sharpton (both insane). More likely Kerry (who married his way to wealth thru a succession of ever-more-wealthy older women - sort of Anna Nicole Smith in mufti). Certainly not Lieberman. Kerry might even be persuaded to pick Grey Davis as a running mate. One GOP insider said: "God is good, but I can't believe he'd be good enough to give us another Massachusetts liberal." Or another senator. The last sitting senator to be elected, out of the many who've run, was JFK. Anyway, the "winner" of the Democrat nomination will get about $60 million (in matching funds) to campaign with from August 1st to November 4th for a total of $120 million. Meanwhile, Bush will have $200 million to counter Democrat ads from January to September. Then another $120 million for September to November. So, in dollars: Dems - $120 million, Bush - $320 million. And Bush has both the military and the Supreme Court on his side. The democrats have letter carriers and mine workers. It's gonna be a slaughter, but an honest one. The Dem convention (Boston) ends July 30th. The GOP convention, in New York, ends the week before the Sept 11th anniversary. I expect Bush will stay over for the rememberance. Probably use the same bull-horn while wearing his new flight suit. If we're lucky, the trials of Saddam or ben Laden (or both) will be getting under way about then.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads