Article View: austin.talk
Article #375Re: Austin or LA?
From: Trace A. Magill
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 00:00
38 lines
2712 bytes
2712 bytes
In article <334B0ADD.4AEA@mundo.eco.utexas.edu>, cdb@mail.utexas.edu wrote: >>The key is to legalize, rob them of these huge profits through >competitive market mechanisms, and then tax the whole market and reap >the benefits through better funding of educational programs which >hopefully would eliminate a majority of the demand for drugs in the long >run. >> >Chris The only problem I have with legalization is: Where do you draw the line on what you want legalized? Granted alcohol and nicotine are the most destructive drugs and available on nearly every street corner. I would find it just a bit disturbing to be able to go into some corner store and buy a loaf of bread, a tank of gas and an 8ball of smack;(I can see a promotion like this..."complementary rig with every 5th 8ball and full tank of gas") Legalization would cut down on the costs of housing prisoners(hopefully there would be fewer inmates). Logically, it seems there would be no more people going up for possesion(depending on what is illegal and not illegal) and fewer folks going up for possesion with intent to distribute. Gang bangers would have less to bang about. Police could spend more time dealing with other violent criminal activity. But then again if every body smoked a bowl everyday,other criminal violence would decrease too(just kidding). This country needs to wake up and smell the coffee(hey to caffeine) when it comes to its stance on drugs. Trace Under the defintions of a drug abuser, I am one. But if I don't get my Dr. Pepper everyday... :)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tamagill-0904970414070001@slip-125-48.ots.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<news-0404971254280001@pombe.esb.utexas.edu> <E85HI2.3MA@unicom.com> <33469F09.698A@ix.netcom.com> <3346D328.6377@eden.com> <5i90kk$ei4$1@news3.realtime.net> <199704061531061149339@s06-pm02-novat-t.telis.org> <334B0ADD.4AEA@mundo.eco.utexas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101d32,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid101d32,public X-Google-Thread: 103916,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public X-Google-Thread: 1064d2,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1064d2,public X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-Thread: ffea8,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidffea8,public X-Google-Thread: 106ac3,ee0129e7857474b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ac3,public From: tamagill@mail.utexas.edu (Trace A. Magill) Subject: Re: Austin or LA? Date: 1997/04/09 Message-ID: <tamagill-0904970414070001@slip-125-48.ots.utexas.edu> X-Deja-AN: 231756538 Distribution: austin References: <news-0404971254280001@pombe.esb.utexas.edu> <E85HI2.3MA@unicom.com> <33469F09.698A@ix.netcom.com> <3346D328.6377@eden.com> <5i90kk$ei4$1@news3.realtime.net> <199704061531061149339@s06-pm02-novat-t.telis.org> <334B0ADD.4AEA@mundo.eco.utexas.edu> Organization: THE University Newsgroups: austin.talk,austin.general,austin.politics,austin.music,utexas.general,tx.general