Article View: austin.talk
Article #4097Re: Reminder: Case against environmentalism lecture
From: John F Haugh II
Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 21:51
Date: Wed, 27 May 1992 21:51
37 lines
3107 bytes
3107 bytes
In article <1992May18.175443.26519@pencom.com> robin@pencom.com writes: >Well,... I just HAD to comment here. Either John doesn't read CR, or he >doesn't read the information on how they do their studies... For the cars: >They rate the cars based on number of reported problems in a specific >mechanical/trim area of the vehicle. The "ratings" are then based on the >"average" number of problems for that particular area, versus the actual for >that car. (ie. if I had 10 problems with the electrical system on my >Oldsmobile, and the average for all cars (in the survey) was 5, I would have >a dark black circle (far below average) on my electrical system rating. If I >had only 2 problems then I would have a solid red circle (far above >average).) CR, makes a disclaimer explaining how they collect results, and >how they make their evaluations; I suggest you read it and decide for >yourself. There is a problem with any study where you solicit the information from the people who have it - people misrepresent the facts because their perception clouds their mind as to what is ``reality''. For example, if I really like my car, I am likely to forget that minor electrical problem I had 3 years ago when I bought it. I was mulling this article over last week when I first read it, and I thought of the perfect example - I really like my car (it's true ...) and when I was thinking of what had been wrong with it since I bought it, I completely forgot about the gear shift cable that broke about a week after I bought the car. Had I filled out the CR survey I'd have written down the broken radio and oil pressure gauge, but not the broken cable. This isn't uncommon at all - people regularly block out events that don't agree with their attitudes or beliefs. [ NB: One very common example of this is the way that women ignore pregnancies that ended in abortion, but not those that ended in live birth or miscarriage. An example of this as it relates to the car industry is the Mitsubishi Eclipse/Plymoth Laser example that I keep giving. ] -- John F. Haugh II | VNET: LCCB386 at AUSVMQ | "Physical Fitness is the SneakerNet: 042/2F068 | MaBell: (512) 823-1078 | basis for all other forms Internet: jfh@devnet.la.locus.com | of excellence" -- JFK
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992May27.215155.25987@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!apple!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!greenber.austin.ibm.com!jfhReferences:
<20783@rpp386.lonestar.org> <1992May18.175443.26519@pencom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ffea8,56635c72c729ef65 X-Google-Attributes: gidffea8,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-05-27 14:51:55 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!apple!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!greenber.austin.ibm.com!jfh From: jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) Newsgroups: austin.talk Subject: Re: Reminder: Case against environmentalism lecture Message-ID: <1992May27.215155.25987@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> Date: 27 May 92 21:51:55 GMT References: <20783@rpp386.lonestar.org> <1992May18.175443.26519@pencom.com> Sender: news@awdprime.austin.ibm.com (USENET News) Distribution: austin Organization: Best Care South of the Red River, LCC, Austin, Republic of Texas Lines: 37