Article View: austin.talk
Article #4115Re: public transport, was: Case against environmentalism lecture
From: Curt Finch 903 2F021 curt 512-83...
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1992 14:23
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1992 14:23
52 lines
3177 bytes
3177 bytes
chipmunk@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Matt Monks) writes: >curt@ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com writes: >>Point 1: >> Mass transportation will never work in Austin. It's just too >> spread out here. It works in Boston, NY, San Francisco, and >> Europe, because those places are dense. >> >> A bus between UT and downtown will work but that about covers >> it. > > Buses between UT and everywhere. As a UT student without a car, ok, i'll buy that, as long as the busses aren't usually empty and I don't have to subsidise it. > $4/gallon gas is an excellent idea. Let the people >know ahead of time that the price will increase, and do it slowly >but steadily over many years... wean us from our dependence on gas-burning >vehicles and encourage efficiency. I don't know if it's an excellent idea or not but the method you've described for implementing it is sound. An even better idea, assumming that carbon emissions is what you really want to avoid, is a carbon tax. Coal would be taxed more than gas, gas more than natural gas, etc. Nuclear and hydro would be untaxed under this method, but you could come up with a waste disposal and destruction of species tax for each of them respectively. The carbon tax was originally proposed by The Economist, or that's where I saw it. The advantage of this sort of tax system is that it lets the market decide as much as possible. The worst of all worlds is a government mandated X mpg rule, which is currently still being considered. Assuming you agree that reducing carbon emissions is the way to go, and not everyone does, the above tax system accomplishes that goal with the least economic damage possible. Phasing things in as you said is smart. >>Point 3: >> Lord deliver me from the Austin American Statesman and their >> $200 million electric trains. If 10% of Austinites rode those > > Give me $200 million worth of natural-gas buses. Gee, i didn't realize anyone was listening. :-) I suspect it could be done far cheaper than 200 mil with natural gas buses, which is what differentiates them from the insane train idea. -- curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt L. Finch) | AIX NFS/NIS Field Quality My views are unrelated to those of IBM | Austin, TX "We have no rules around here. We're trying accomplish something."-Thomas Edison
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jun4.142307.16155@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!wotan.compaq.com!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com!curtReferences:
<vm9g2INNdrn@cs.utexas.edu> <1992May27.202247.24079@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> <73205@ut-emx.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ffea8,56635c72c729ef65 X-Google-Attributes: gidffea8,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-04 07:23:07 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!wotan.compaq.com!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com!curt From: curt@ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch 903 2F021 curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com 512-838-2806) Newsgroups: austin.talk Subject: Re: public transport, was: Case against environmentalism lecture Message-ID: <1992Jun4.142307.16155@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> Date: 4 Jun 92 14:23:07 GMT References: <vm9g2INNdrn@cs.utexas.edu> <1992May27.202247.24079@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> <73205@ut-emx.uucp> Sender: news@awdprime.austin.ibm.com (USENET News) Distribution: austin Organization: IBM AWD, Austin Lines: 52