🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mapanari" <The_Lord@anonmail.com> wrote in message 
news:Xns9845D6DF5145Cmapi@216.168.3.64...
> Bill Carter <qhk6cxl02@sneakemail.com>
> wrotenews:Pq6dnaD-E964hI7YnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>> Chow S wrote:
>>> don't bother with the AAS, it is 99.44% CRAP directed by the owner a
>>> leftist liberal bitch out of Atlanta Georgia.
>>>
>>> AAS is so bad that they deliver it for free to about 1/2 their
>>> "customers"
>>>
>>> even the chief editor is an opinionated idiot,
>>
>> Most of section A of the AAS comes directly from the Associate Press
>> or the Reuters wire services. If its crap then all the other papers
>> in the country are also crap. At least 80% of the AAS is local, sports,
>> business, and entertainment news. How biased can that be?
>>
>> Now, what a newspaper can do is select which wire service articles to
>> print in section A and where to place it. The papers in some
>> cities I've visited simply omit anything critical of the Republicans
>> and place the favorable articles right up on the front page. Reminds
>> me of the old Soviet Union. AAS seems pretty even-minded in that
>> respect, they will dish both sides.
>>
>> The editorial page is a different matter. You do realize that an
>> editorial is an opinion by definition, right? And Austin is a liberal
>> city, a progressive opinion is well received. There are plenty of
>> newspapers in the Wall Street Journal mold, AAS is relatively balanced.
>>
>
>
> The demographis are killing newspapers!
>
> That's why they're so stupid and keep putting out the liberal psyops
> propaganda pc bullshit, because they can't figure out who their readers
> are.
>
> See, the only people who read newspapers are white, educated, well off,
> older people.
>
> Blacks, Ricans, Meskins, injuns, illegals, gay wads, the stupid, the
> illiterate and most liberals don't.
>
> And Austin, becuase the stupid liberals, in their desire and greed for 
> ever
> more taxation without representation, annexed in a frenzy a lot of white
> well off burbs in the 90's.
>
> This made the real "city" of Austin composed of:
>
>  A bunch of non-voting, ignorant students and their teachers, very little
> readership
>  A lot of young liberals.  They get the paper to see what concerts are in
> town and rarely get a full week subscription.
>
>  A lot of angry white middle class people, who get the paper because there
> is non else.
>
>  And the rest of teeming breeding ratlike cockroaches comprised of
> meskins, blacks and other minorities, most of the woefully ignorant, many
> of them illiterate, and many criminal and poor.
>
>
> So, the AAS still is trying to appeal only to the white upper class
> "educated" liberal, which is a small minority.
>
> This is why the AAS stays the exact same in readership, which is actually 
> a
> tremendous decline in per capita readership, due to the doubling of our
> population.  But their readership levels stay the same.
>
> Chee?  I wonder why?
>


they had to cut costs because of lowering sales, and have a "low cost" lot 
of writers/journalists, under 30 crowd mostly.
that is why most of their articles are from outside feeds
Cox owns both the AAS and Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the leftist 
liberal crap is driven by the Atlanta office.
I have canceled the stinking AAS at least 5 times, and they still litter my 
lawn with their poo, I use a pooper scooper and dump it in the trash.
It is that bad.   It is a stinker, a fish wrapper.  Much worse than 10 years 
ago.  The ownership change killed it.
Even the allergy report is wrong, it is an estimate not measured.
Cheap low cost crap.