Re: McExpress, feedback

Article View: av.avid

Article #243

#243

From: Wes Plate
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 00:00

18 lines
1204 bytes

gordon inglis wrote:
> 
> As I understand it the McExpress is the bottom end Avid, is this correct?
> What are the compromises that this system has made?
> What are its limitations? Its strengths?
> 
> Has anyone any experience with the Razor and the Avid? I'd be interested in
> your comparison.

MCX isn't a bad system, its powerful for its price.  I've barely ever
heard of Razor, however, so I cannot compare the products.  My guess is
that unless the editing tools on the Razor are comparable to the Media
Composer, the transition will be fine for you.  check out this webpage,
it compares the MCX and the Media Composer...

http://www.dmec.com/Pages/mcvmcx1.html

Technical Details

Message-ID: <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fba3d,1571910794bd5e59
X-Google-Attributes: gidfba3d,public
From: Wes Plate <wes@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: McExpress, feedback
Date: 1998/05/18
Message-ID: <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com>
X-Deja-AN: 354058044
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net>
To: gordon inglis <gordon_inglis@bc.sympatico.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: wes@gocougs.wsu.edu
Newsgroups: av.avid

Reply to Parent Message