Re: McExpress, feedback

Article View: av.avid

Article #249

#249

From: Daved Hagel
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 00:00

25 lines
1523 bytes

Sick wit hthe Mac version of MCX.  I agree that it is a powerfull system for 
the price but the NT version of MCX is buggy and from my view Avid is doing 
little to improve it.


In article <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com>, wes@nwlink.com says...
>
>gordon inglis wrote:
>> 
>> As I understand it the McExpress is the bottom end Avid, is this correct?
>> What are the compromises that this system has made?
>> What are its limitations? Its strengths?
>> 
>> Has anyone any experience with the Razor and the Avid? I'd be interested in
>> your comparison.
>
>
>MCX isn't a bad system, its powerful for its price.  I've barely ever
>heard of Razor, however, so I cannot compare the products.  My guess is
>that unless the editing tools on the Razor are comparable to the Media
>Composer, the transition will be fine for you.  check out this webpage,
>it compares the MCX and the Media Composer...
>
>http://www.dmec.com/Pages/mcvmcx1.html

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6l7fnf$nij$2@supernews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net> <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fba3d,1571910794bd5e59
X-Google-Attributes: gidfba3d,public
From: subrec@geocities.com (Daved Hagel)
Subject: Re: McExpress, feedback
Date: 1998/06/05
Message-ID: <6l7fnf$nij$2@supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 359665756
References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net> <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
X-Trace: 897008175 .8SRWVWXM8557C7AAC usenet14.supernews.com
Organization: Subrec
Newsgroups: av.avid

Reply to Parent Message