Re: McExpress, feedback

Article View: av.avid

Article #251

#251

From: Steve Wellington
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 00:00

19 lines
1546 bytes

Daved Hagel wrote:

> Sick wit hthe Mac version of MCX.  I agree that it is a powerfull system for
> the price but the NT version of MCX is buggy and from my view Avid is doing
> little to improve it.

This is not totaly true. 1.5 is not that buggy. most buggyness comes in with that
fact that there are so mny different machines out there that people try to install
it on. Plus three different truevision boards. Ver 1.5 with a Rtx.dtx board is
rock solid. yes there are features that could be implimented (which 1.6 doea fix
some) but those can't be called bugs. I got a 1.5 on a compaq 6000 installed and
runing rock solid (24 hour burn in) in under 2 hours. It is very good for the
price (turn key can be 10K+ less then the mac version) Yes avid isn't putting a
ton of work into NT but they are not ignoreing it. And with Symphony comeing out
Greater things may be on the way. Yes Nt is not as Good as the Xpress but it is
good. (better the Speed razor or D-vision)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <35783C76.23CBBBDC@3pointdigital.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net> <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com> <6l7fnf$nij$2@supernews.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fba3d,1571910794bd5e59
X-Google-Attributes: gidfba3d,public
From: Steve Wellington <swelling@3pointdigital.com>
Subject: Re: McExpress, feedback
Date: 1998/06/05
Message-ID: <35783C76.23CBBBDC@3pointdigital.com>
X-Deja-AN: 359914433
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6j82m1$eoc$1@news.bctel.net> <35606A1D.5CC4EBEF@nwlink.com> <6l7fnf$nij$2@supernews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Three Point Digital
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: av.avid

Reply to Parent Message