🚀 go-pugleaf

> Daved Replys:
>
> You'll get no arguement that it's the best thing going for NT, but the fact is
> that it is very buggy and not very "rock solid".  I'm running a RTX board and
> have more "tiny" problems then I ever would have thought possable...and I had
> my dealer configure a "working" system for me beacuse of the compatibility
> issues.

Who was you rdealer, what system did they put on it, and what board do you have.
Hand what drives are you running?

> The bug list for 1.51 could take up a page and a half easy.  IF you are one of
> those that have a working system without bugs, great, congratulation.  But
> there are a lot of us that do not.  If you don't believe me, look at the MCX
> product disscussion board on the Avid BBS.  The complaints got so loud around
> NAB that they had to create a special fourm for complaints to keep the main
> fourm open for tips & tricks.

True. Most bugs are due to the wide verity of systems out there. It took me a long
time to get the first systems up and running bug free. I will admit there are some
major small bugs (the boris effects bug seems to be poping up). But again any
system will have these bigs (includeing MC 9000) You should have seen the fuss when
7.0 came out.

> Anyone considering an MCX system should have this information.  So do work
> fine, but some do not, and I know of many an MCX-NT user that has some serious
> problems.

Your right, there are problems, and I will admit Nt is not perfect, but it is
cheap.If I had a choic I would buy an Xpress, but they is also 20K differance.

Steve