🚀 go-pugleaf

Eugene P. Glover (gridman@primenet.com) wrote:

[snip]

: Hardly.  Bloating the hierarchy implies creating more group names.
: Not enough traffic implies not enough messages to justify the bloated
: new group name.

No.. the comment was about 'message traffic' in the 'bloat' (I think.. 
I'll have to see if I still can find it..)

: I could see how someone might get confused by Woody's statement though.
: He's always "foolin' 'em with his funny footprints."

yeah... and when he has a hidden agenda..

[snip]

: And if the newsgroup gets created... we'll be there.  My concern is
: apart from the 8 of us, Jim and yourself...  how many others will
: be there?  another 8-10 people?  

a valid point.. but we need to have the place there first..

[snip]

: Look who is discussing this in az.config?  I see 5 people with 
: some interest in the concept and a couple more who are against
: not only because they wish to avoid newsgroup bloat, but because
: they aren't interested.


: Morgan told me about this discussion, and I don't see him here.

: Get some other people in here to discuss this!  Show me that there
: are more people interested in this than I think there are.

"On that Mollari we can at least agree.."

Yes, let's get some more people in here that are interested in the 
discussion, not just wanting to piss someone off for their own little 
games...

I'm amazed.. wrong about someone twice in one day...  you make some 
intelligent and worthwhile comments Eugene..