Article View: az.internet
Article #123Re: Opinions on Comcast
From: AZ Nomad
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20
52 lines
3118 bytes
3118 bytes
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:54:29 +0000 (UTC), desertrat <desertrat@nospam.com> wrote: >AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> wrote in >news:slrndnn6t6.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net: >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:49:33 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:33:41 +0000 (UTC), desertrat >>><desertrat@nospam.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>Can any share their opinions on comcast for high speed internet? >>>>Compared to cox or others? >> >>>>Their webpage is very privacy invasive requring cookies and >>>>javascript and they do not give prices until you give your address. >>>>Already I have a bad impression. >> >>>works fine. Keep in mind that cable internet is a party line. >>>Traffic out on the cble is visible to your neighbors and visa versa. >>>The more neighbors you have on the line, the less your available >>>bandwidth. >Thanks for the reply. Is dialup usually given in Kb/s or KB/s? If KB/s >then upload is slower than dialup (cannot be)? >Also not so worried about speed, but more worried about bad service and >value for money and security. I've hear alot of complaints about all of >them so am deciding whether the jump from dialup is worth the price and >aggravation. >> >>>I'm paying the extra $20 for the higher speed version. I routinely >>>get over a MB/second. Compare that to DSL's top speed of about >>>.15MB/s. Upload speeds suck however; standard cable internet is >>>128Kb/s or 16KB/s. (b=bit; B=byte) The higher speed version is good >>>for upload speeds of 1024Kb/s (128KB/s) >> Dialup is Kb/s. A 56K modem is actually capped at about 50Kb/s and can push about 5KB/second. I haven't had any security problems, but I also have a 'router' between my cable modem and home LAN. It acts as a simple firewall. DSL has better security than DSL as you have a dedicated line between you and the main office. However, DSL means having to use Qwest. I've personally found DSL less reliable than cable internet. Either is such a huge improvement over dial up that you'll never want to go back.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrndnnc5i.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<dlfu21$5g2$1@domitilla.aioe.org> <slrndnn6ro.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net> <slrndnn6t6.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net> <dlg9qj$k7d$1@domitilla.aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: febea,c85457e89ccadce1 X-Google-Thread: 1084c1,c85457e89ccadce1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfebea,gid1084c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: az.internet,az.general From: AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com> Subject: Re: Opinions on Comcast References: <dlfu21$5g2$1@domitilla.aioe.org> <slrndnn6ro.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net> <slrndnn6t6.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net> <dlg9qj$k7d$1@domitilla.aioe.org> Message-ID: <slrndnnc5i.79n.aznomad@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) Lines: 52 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:20:07 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.2.198.209 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: fed1read03 1132179607 68.2.198.209 (Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:20:07 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:20:07 EST Organization: Cox Communications