🚀 go-pugleaf

Unfortunately, a lot of people have had much longer waits.  I've had to 
wait more than an hour.  This hasn't been a serious problem for me 
because I can work my schedule around the peak periods.

But recently, I've found that I haven't been able to get my web pages 
from the Internet side, even after waiting more than five minutes to get 
a page that I used to get in about 20 seconds.  These pages represent 
my business and I can't afford to have my business represented this 
way.

I emailed tech support and received a reply about 24 hours later asking 
me where my web pages are at.  After answering, I haven't heard back.
I emailed Admin this morning and haven't received a response.

I've generally enjoyed the service at Indirect and have been very happy 
with the pricing, but it looks like I'll just have to shell out some more 
money and go somewhere else, and that's too bad because I really did 
like it here.

In article <43d81t$f4a@globe.indirect.com> 
nybill@indirect.com (Bill Domres) writes:
>From: nybill@indirect.com (Bill Domres)
>Subject: Indirect.Com busy sig
>Date: 16 Sep 1995 01:08:13 GMT

>I have been a client of indirect.com for several years and have found 
>them to be most obliging whenever I encountered difficulties.  I use 
>Procomm+ as the software for my modem and during the busiest times I have 
>only had to wait 4 minutes at most to get online.  However, Procomm keeps 
>dialing when it encounters a busy signal.  I am curious how these other 
>people can complain about busy signals that are that short.  My daughters 
>tie up the phone for hours not four minutes.  I am not endorsing Indirect 
>just replying to an exaggeration.  Regards to all, Bill.