🚀 go-pugleaf

webmaster@superb.com wrote:
: mikeh41@indirect.com (Michael Henrichs) wrote:

: >** Edited for Brevity **
: >Susan C. Mitchell (susanm@indirect.com) wrote:
: >:>>Dale Roose (crayhobb@cutcson.com) wrote:
: >:>>: In article <40blbr$dkd@globe.indirect.com> 
: >:>>: webmaster@superb.com writes:

: >:>>: >For all those users of Internet Direct - have they ever E-Mailed you
: >:>>: >because of something you posted in a USENET group?  That just happened
: >:>>: >to me.  It's kind of scary.

: >:>>: >-Mark
: >:>>: stuff missing...

: >:>>: No, this hasn't happened to me.

: >:>>Me neither.

: >--
: >Mark,
: >What did you post? Did it break any Indirect policies?

: Are there policies on what I can post to USENET groups?  Do they
: censor posts?

: -Mark

{sig snipped}

I actually have had e-mail from someone at indirect.com because of 
something that I wrote in a news group, BUT he WAS doing me a favor and 
pointing out something that I needed to know to stay clear of a lot of 
flames.  But this feedback could have come from any source since it was a 
response to a public message.

I have not yet seen indirect.com censor any messages.  I don't know how 
or why they'd want to considering what else is already in the news groups.

However, I have found news.indirect.com to be an unreliable news feeder.
Maybe it is flawed or maybe it inherits problems from its source, but 
I'm often missing parts of multipart uuencoded files.  I like to collect 
.mod and .wav files and they are worthless if you can't get all the parts!


    Len
    genesis@indirect.com