Article View: ba.bicycles
Article #120SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian
From: jcdill
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31
70 lines
5459 bytes
5459 bytes
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/15/BAUL1KB1PH.DTL&tsp=1> Briefly: Bicyclist, northbound on Embarcadero, runs a red light and plows into a 60 year old woman who was crossing in the cross walk. She suffered a very serious life-threatening head injury. This is why bicyclists need to obey traffic laws! In my $dayjob I take photos for insurance companies, often asked to take photos at an intersection where an accident happened. About once a month I get an assignment to take photos at an intersection where there was a car/bike accident. (I had one such assignment yesterday.) In all but one assignment so far, the bike came from the driver's right side, riding the wrong way in the bike lane, on the shoulder, or on the sidewalk. When a car is at a stop sign or pulling out from a driveway, the driver does not think they have to be on the alert for fast moving traffic (e.g. something moving faster than a walking pedestrian on the sidewalk) coming from their right. So the driver glances right (to make sure there are no pedestrians) then just as the driver looks left, to see if it's clear to pull out into the roadway, and then pulls out, suddenly the previously hidden (by a fence, by a building, by shrubbery etc.) bike comes into view and is hit or hits the car. The fence, building, or shrubbery poses no serious impairment to seeing a slower moving pedestrian, but with a faster moving bike, suddenly it creates a situation where the driver simply can NOT see the bike before the accident. I don't know the insurance resolutions of these cases. (I don't work directly for the insurance companies, I work for a 3rd party they contract with to have the photos taken.) But I do know that 100% of the time the bicyclist would have completely avoided that accident if they had been following the rules of the road and going the correct way (with the flow of traffic) so that as they approach each driveway and intersection along their route they are in the direction drivers LOOK for oncoming traffic before they pull out on the road. In all of the cases I've seen, there was no reason to prefer this side of the road, the other side of the road was equally accessible, equally safe to ride on a bicycle. The bike riders rode the wrong way because they were either ignorant of the rules of the road, or too lazy to take the time to cross the road and ride in the correct direction. The single exception (in my $dayjob assignments) was for an accident where the bike was going with the flow of traffic. Except the bicyclist was on a sidewalk, not in the bike lane - a LARGE and well signed bike lane on the roadway next to the sidewalk - in Santa Cruz (a city that has worked hard to build bike lanes to make it safer to get around on a bike). The car was pulling out of a parking lot, in a driveway next to a building that abuts both the driveway and the sidewalk. From this driveway it is impossible for a car to look left to if it's clear to pull out onto the street without first pulling far enough forward that the vehicle is blocking the sidewalk. When the car pulled forward, the bicyclist (who was hidden from the driver's view by the building) had no time to avoid the car and plowed into the driver's side front fender. Again, this accident was 100% avoidable if the bicyclist had been where the bike was supposed to be, in the bike lane 10 feet away from the building, instead of on the sidewalk adjacent to the building. Folks, please remember the rules of the road are there for a darn good reason, and don't run stop signs, red lights, or ride the wrong way or on the sidewalk. Also, remember that if you do run a red light, the fine is just as high as if you were driving a car. A few months ago I saw a bicyclist pulled over for stop/pause/continue going (because it was "clear") on Harrison in SF. She didn't notice the cop stopped at the light just two lanes to her left, who immediately put on his lights and pulled across and pulled her over. That's a ~$400 mistake. I hope she learned her lesson. Too bad the bicyclist in the linked article hadn't learned this lesson before today. I hope his victim survives! jc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ivqbit$7c2$1@dont-email.me>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10decc,532605e062f7b014,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida51cdb3390,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jcdill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> Newsgroups: ba.bicycles Subject: SF Bicyclist runs red light, seriously injures pedestrian Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:31:08 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <ivqbit$7c2$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="AD+iZ7r5oZlw3BePk0A11g"; logging-data="7554"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4cHn9/Zt9tc4kbeRa9xuwPP7oMhID5t0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 Cancel-Lock: sha1:unh2OedaFUwQKTc4xHorJ/YasLo=